GQI vs. COSW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GQI (Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF) and COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GQI charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for COSW.

Performance

GQI vs. COSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQI achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 13.62% return.

GQI

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 8.41%
• 6M: 9.37%
• 1Y: 23.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COSW

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: -5.52%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQI vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	8.41%	4.26%
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	13.62%	-10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GQI and COSW is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	0.04

GQI vs. COSW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GQI	COSW
Technology	35.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	-
Communication Services	11.4%	-
Financial Services	10.3%	-
Industrials	8.9%	-
Healthcare	8.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	7.9%
Energy	5.3%	-
Utilities	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	0.6%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

GQI vs. COSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQI

GQI Risk / Return Rank: 80
GQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
GQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GQI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GQI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQI vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GQI	COSW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.99	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQI	COSW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	0.09	+1.18

Drawdowns

GQI vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQI drawdown since its inception was -16.56%, roughly equal to the maximum COSW drawdown of -16.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQI and COSW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQI	COSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.56%	-16.24%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-13.49%	+13.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-4.23%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GQI	COSW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.93%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.51%	26.07%	-16.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.12%	26.07%	-12.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	26.07%	-12.95%

GQI vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQI has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than COSW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQI vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison

GQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, less than COSW's 17.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	17.89%	4.96%	0.00%	0.00%
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	8.71%	8.97%	7.77%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQI and COSW in my portfolio?

GQI and COSW have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GQI or COSW?

On fees, GQI is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GQI or COSW?

GQI is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GQI or COSW?

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 17.89%, compared with 8.71% for GQI.

What is the main difference between GQI and COSW?

They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for GQI and 0.99% for COSW.