PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQGU vs. SGRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQGU vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 48.90% return.


GQGU

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
6.44%
6M
7.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SGRT

1D
-1.69%
1M
9.59%
YTD
48.90%
6M
51.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQGU vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
6.44%-3.27%
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
48.90%25.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GQGU and SGRT is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQGU vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GQGU vs. SGRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQGUSGRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

3.63

-3.05

Drawdowns

GQGU vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, smaller than the maximum SGRT drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and SGRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQGUSGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-17.87%

+11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

-1.69%

-3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-3.10%

+0.55%

Volatility

GQGU vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQGUSGRTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.12%

33.40%

-23.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.12%

33.40%

-23.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.12%

33.40%

-23.28%

GQGU vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQGU vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
0.96%1.02%
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
0.11%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQGU and SGRT have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.

Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.59% for SGRT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQGU and SGRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer