GQEFX vs. BKTSX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GQEFX (GMO Quality Fund Class IV) and BKTSX (iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GQEFX is actively managed, while BKTSX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GQEFX returned 13.05%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for BKTSX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GQEFX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BKTSX.

Performance

GQEFX vs. BKTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQEFX achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly lower than BKTSX's 10.89% return.

GQEFX

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 6M: 6.17%
• 1Y: 21.26%
• 3Y*: 17.42%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: —

BKTSX

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 4.00%
• YTD: 10.89%
• 6M: 10.63%
• 1Y: 27.71%
• 3Y*: 21.99%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: 15.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQEFX vs. BKTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV	4.98%	19.64%	17.54%	28.95%	-15.30%	31.76%	18.39%	31.87%	0.54%	10.45%
BKTSX iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K	10.89%	17.15%	23.83%	26.02%	-19.05%	25.56%	20.82%	31.12%	-5.37%	11.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GQEFX and BKTSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017	0.93

The correlation between GQEFX and BKTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GQEFX vs. BKTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQEFX

GQEFX Risk / Return Rank: 34
GQEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GQEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
GQEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GQEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
GQEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BKTSX

BKTSX Risk / Return Rank: 65
BKTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BKTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BKTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
BKTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BKTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQEFX vs. BKTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GQEFX	BKTSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.29	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	3.14	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.41	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	3.14	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	14.42	-7.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GQEFX vs. BKTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQEFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the BKTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQEFX and BKTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQEFX	BKTSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	2.29	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.74	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.82	+0.06

Drawdowns

GQEFX vs. BKTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQEFX drawdown since its inception was -30.42%, smaller than the maximum BKTSX drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQEFX and BKTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQEFX	BKTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.42%	-34.97%	+4.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.74%	-8.87%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.55%	-19.29%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.22%	-24.98%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-0.75%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-4.53%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	1.93%	+1.28%

Volatility

GQEFX vs. BKTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) is 2.89%, while iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that GQEFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQEFX	BKTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.89%	3.05%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.48%	9.14%	+0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.25%	12.18%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.87%	17.36%	-1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.76%	18.41%	-0.65%

GQEFX vs. BKTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQEFX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than BKTSX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQEFX vs. BKTSX - Dividend Comparison

GQEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, more than BKTSX's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BKTSX iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K	1.05%	1.14%	1.27%	1.46%	1.64%	1.58%	1.51%	2.15%	2.49%	2.17%	1.54%
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV	10.62%	11.15%	3.70%	3.43%	11.84%	10.23%	13.62%	8.09%	21.69%	7.08%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQEFX and BKTSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, GQEFX and BKTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GQEFX or BKTSX?

BKTSX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to GQEFX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQEFX dropped -30.42% vs BKTSX's -34.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.