GQEFX vs. GAAVX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) and GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX).

GQEFX is an actively managed fund by GMO. It was launched on Feb 6, 2004. GAAVX is managed by GMO. It was launched on May 1, 2019.

Performance

GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) and GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV	-7.00%	19.64%	17.54%	28.95%	-15.30%	31.76%	18.39%	16.15%
GAAVX GMO Alternative Allocation Fund	3.33%	15.19%	-5.70%	6.07%	3.63%	-5.12%	-0.28%	3.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQEFX achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than GAAVX's 3.33% return.

GQEFX

• 1D: 2.80%
• 1M: -6.44%
• YTD: -7.00%
• 6M: -2.28%
• 1Y: 12.46%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: —

GAAVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 3.33%
• 6M: 10.87%
• 1Y: 13.78%
• 3Y*: 5.94%
• 5Y*: 3.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQEFX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GAAVX's 0.61% expense ratio.

GAAVX

GMO Alternative Allocation Fund

GQEFX

GMO Quality Fund Class IV

Return for Risk

GQEFX vs. GAAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQEFX

GQEFX Risk / Return Rank: 26
GQEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GQEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GQEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
GQEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
GQEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

GAAVX

GAAVX Risk / Return Rank: 90
GAAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
GAAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GAAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GAAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GAAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) and GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GQEFX	GAAVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.95	-1.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	3.08	-1.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.38	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	3.79	-2.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.06	9.05	-4.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQEFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the GAAVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQEFX and GAAVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQEFX	GAAVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	1.95	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.63	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.47	+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between GQEFX and GAAVX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Dividend Comparison

GQEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.99%, more than GAAVX's 8.49% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV	11.99%	11.15%	3.70%	3.43%	11.84%	10.23%	13.62%	8.09%	21.69%	7.08%
GAAVX GMO Alternative Allocation Fund	8.49%	8.78%	0.00%	5.18%	0.91%	4.10%	2.41%	2.61%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQEFX drawdown since its inception was -30.42%, which is greater than GAAVX's maximum drawdown of -9.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQEFX and GAAVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQEFX	GAAVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.42%	-9.59%	-20.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.74%	-3.09%	-9.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.22%	-9.59%	-14.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.30%	-1.20%	-9.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-3.11%	-1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	1.54%	+1.63%

Volatility

GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX) at 1.85%. This indicates that GQEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQEFX	GAAVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	1.85%	+3.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.67%	4.81%	+4.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.60%	6.82%	+9.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.86%	5.81%	+10.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.84%	5.87%	+11.97%