GQEFX vs. GAAVX
GQEFX (GMO Quality Fund Class IV) and GAAVX (GMO Alternative Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - GQEFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by GMO, while GAAVX is a Multistrategy fund managed by GMO. Over the past 5 years, GQEFX returned 13.43%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for GAAVX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GQEFX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for GAAVX.
Performance
GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQEFX achieves a 6.09% return, which is significantly higher than GAAVX's 1.31% return.
GQEFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 6.09%
- 6M
- 7.49%
- 1Y
- 23.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
GAAVX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 3.15%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.70%
- 5Y*
- 2.47%
- 10Y*
- —
GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV | 6.09% | 19.64% | 17.54% | 28.95% | -15.30% | 31.76% | 18.39% | 16.15% |
GAAVX GMO Alternative Allocation Fund | 1.31% | 15.19% | -5.70% | 6.07% | 3.63% | -5.12% | -0.28% | 3.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQEFX and GAAVX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.31 |
The correlation between GQEFX and GAAVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQEFX vs. GAAVX — Risk / Return Rank
GQEFX
GAAVX
GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) and GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQEFX | GAAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 2.21 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 3.61 | -0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 4.07 | -2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 11.64 | -4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQEFX | GAAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.21 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.42 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.41 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQEFX drawdown since its inception was -30.42%, which is greater than GAAVX's maximum drawdown of -9.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQEFX and GAAVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQEFX | GAAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.42% | -9.59% | -20.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.74% | -3.39% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.55% | -7.73% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -9.59% | -14.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.13% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -3.08% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 1.19% | +2.01% |
Volatility
GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Volatility Comparison
GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX) at 1.99%. This indicates that GQEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQEFX | GAAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 1.99% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 4.94% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.24% | 6.52% | +5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 5.88% | +9.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 5.90% | +11.86% |
GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQEFX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GAAVX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQEFX vs. GAAVX - Dividend Comparison
GQEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.51%, more than GAAVX's 8.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAAVX GMO Alternative Allocation Fund | 8.66% | 8.78% | 0.00% | 5.18% | 0.91% | 4.10% | 2.41% | 2.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GQEFX GMO Quality Fund Class IV | 10.51% | 11.15% | 3.70% | 3.43% | 11.84% | 10.23% | 13.62% | 8.09% | 21.69% | 7.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GQEFX and GAAVX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GQEFX has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to GAAVX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQEFX dropped -30.42% vs GAAVX's -9.59%.
GAAVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GQEFX and GAAVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer