GPZ vs. COMT
GPZ (VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GPZ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. GPZ is passively managed, while COMT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. GPZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
GPZ vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPZ achieves a -19.37% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.
GPZ
- 1D
- -4.70%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- YTD
- -19.37%
- 6M
- -16.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.06%
- 1Y
- 47.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
GPZ vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | -19.37% | 9.43% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 39.67% | 5.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPZ and COMT is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | -0.19 |
GPZ vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GPZ
COMT
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
GPZ
COMT
Real Estate
GPZ
COMT
-
Basic Materials
GPZ
-
COMT
-
Communication Services
GPZ
-
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
GPZ
-
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
GPZ
-
COMT
-
Energy
GPZ
-
COMT
-
Healthcare
GPZ
-
COMT
-
Industrials
GPZ
-
COMT
-
Technology
GPZ
-
COMT
-
Utilities
GPZ
-
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPZ vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
GPZ
COMT
GPZ vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPZ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.20 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
GPZ vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPZ drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPZ and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPZ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -51.89% | +20.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.93% | -4.82% | -21.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.74% | -24.07% | +12.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility
GPZ vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPZ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.33% | 21.29% | +6.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 21.06% | +6.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 18.89% | +8.44% |
GPZ vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPZ vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
GPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.54% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | 1.03% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPZ and COMT have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GPZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GPZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 1.03% for GPZ.
GPZ is categorized as Financials Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GPZ and 0.48% for COMT.
Find the right allocation for GPZ and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer