GPTY vs. TSYY
GPTY (YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GPTY returned 48.97% vs -5.48% for TSYY. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
GPTY vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPTY achieves a 30.08% return, which is significantly higher than TSYY's -17.16% return.
GPTY
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 30.08%
- 6M
- 26.46%
- 1Y
- 48.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- -17.16%
- 6M
- -17.01%
- 1Y
- -5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPTY vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GPTY YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 30.08% | 17.77% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -17.16% | -21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPTY and TSYY is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025 | 0.55 |
The correlation between GPTY and TSYY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPTY vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank
GPTY
TSYY
GPTY vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPTY | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.00 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | -0.19 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | -0.37 | +7.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPTY | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | -0.18 | +2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | -0.59 | +1.82 |
Drawdowns
GPTY vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPTY drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum TSYY drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTY and TSYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPTY | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.62% | -41.52% | +14.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.32% | -28.39% | +9.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -37.12% | +31.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -25.98% | +19.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.26% | 14.71% | -7.45% |
Volatility
GPTY vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) has a higher volatility of 10.28% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) at 6.01%. This indicates that GPTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPTY | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.28% | 6.01% | +4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.62% | 19.90% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.54% | 31.52% | -6.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.38% | 37.51% | -8.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.38% | 37.51% | -8.13% |
GPTY vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GPTY and TSYY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
GPTY vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison
GPTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.49%, less than TSYY's 278.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GPTY YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 33.49% | 34.23% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 278.11% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPTY and TSYY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPTY has higher volatility (10.28%) compared to TSYY (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPTY dropped -26.62% vs TSYY's -41.52%.
On 1-year performance, GPTY leads with 48.97% vs -5.48% for TSYY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 6.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPTY has performed better with a 48.97% return vs -5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPTY and TSYY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 278.11%, compared with 33.49% for GPTY.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and GraniteShares.
GPTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPTY and TSYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer