GPTY vs. BRKC
GPTY (YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and BRKC (YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GPTY returned 39.93% vs -0.86% for BRKC. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
GPTY vs. BRKC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPTY achieves a 27.19% return, which is significantly higher than BRKC's -1.08% return.
GPTY
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 27.19%
- 6M
- 25.48%
- 1Y
- 39.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRKC
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- -0.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GPTY vs. BRKC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GPTY YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 27.19% | 12.35% |
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.08% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPTY and BRKC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPTY vs. BRKC — Risk / Return Rank
GPTY
BRKC
GPTY vs. BRKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) and YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPTY | BRKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.00 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | -0.11 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | -0.23 | +5.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPTY vs. BRKC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPTY drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, which is greater than BRKC's maximum drawdown of -7.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTY and BRKC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPTY | BRKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.62% | -7.59% | -19.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.32% | -7.59% | -11.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.05% | -3.07% | -4.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -3.15% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 3.73% | +3.66% |
Volatility
GPTY vs. BRKC - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (GPTY) has a higher volatility of 12.32% compared to YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC) at 2.50%. This indicates that GPTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPTY | BRKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.32% | 2.50% | +9.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.48% | 9.71% | +10.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.61% | 12.58% | +13.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.71% | 12.48% | +17.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.71% | 12.48% | +17.23% |
GPTY vs. BRKC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GPTY and BRKC have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
GPTY vs. BRKC - Dividend Comparison
GPTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.91%, more than BRKC's 20.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF | 20.96% | 10.81% |
GPTY YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | 34.91% | 34.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPTY and BRKC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPTY has higher volatility (12.32%) compared to BRKC (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPTY dropped -26.62% vs BRKC's -7.59%.
On 1-year performance, GPTY leads with 39.93% vs -0.86% for BRKC. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, BRKC has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPTY has performed better with a 39.93% return vs -0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPTY and BRKC have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
GPTY has the higher dividend yield at 34.91%, compared with 20.96% for BRKC.
GPTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPTY and BRKC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer