GPTCX vs. SIFAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GPTCX (GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund) and SIFAX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, GPTCX returned 6.18%/yr vs 3.55%/yr for SIFAX. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GPTCX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SIFAX.

Performance

GPTCX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPTCX achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, GPTCX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 6.18%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.55% annualized return.

GPTCX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 2.18%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 14.01%
• 3Y*: 11.01%
• 5Y*: 5.18%
• 10Y*: 6.18%

SIFAX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: 8.08%
• 6M: 7.70%
• 1Y: 12.43%
• 3Y*: 7.51%
• 5Y*: 5.83%
• 10Y*: 3.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPTCX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GPTCX GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund	5.33%	12.54%	8.12%	10.64%	-12.41%	9.37%	8.47%	16.21%	-4.80%	11.52%
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund	8.08%	7.82%	4.08%	-1.74%	8.48%	10.83%	-1.59%	5.68%	-3.64%	-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between GPTCX and SIFAX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.35

The correlation between GPTCX and SIFAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GPTCX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPTCX

GPTCX Risk / Return Rank: 61
GPTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
GPTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
GPTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GPTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
GPTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SIFAX

SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 73
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPTCX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPTCX	SIFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.31	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	3.36	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.44	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	5.18	-2.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.28	16.54	-4.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPTCX vs. SIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPTCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the SIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPTCX and SIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPTCX	SIFAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.31	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	1.05	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.68	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.34	+0.35

Drawdowns

GPTCX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPTCX drawdown since its inception was -20.89%, smaller than the maximum SIFAX drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPTCX and SIFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPTCX	SIFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.89%	-23.62%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.14%	-2.41%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.08%	-3.57%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.89%	-8.32%	-12.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.89%	-14.69%	-6.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.83%	+1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-8.55%	+4.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	0.75%	+0.41%

Volatility

GPTCX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison

GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund (GPTCX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) have volatilities of 2.09% and 2.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPTCX	SIFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.09%	2.18%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.00%	4.69%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.10%	5.41%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.27%	5.60%	+2.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.44%	5.22%	+3.22%

GPTCX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPTCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPTCX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison

GPTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than SIFAX's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPTCX GuidePath Conservative Allocation Fund	3.62%	3.82%	3.07%	3.20%	2.18%	3.46%	2.07%	2.11%	1.87%	1.65%	10.91%	10.01%
SIFAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund	4.21%	4.55%	3.25%	3.82%	11.90%	7.89%	1.45%	1.49%	1.90%	1.39%	1.15%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPTCX and SIFAX in my portfolio?

GPTCX and SIFAX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPTCX or SIFAX?

SIFAX has higher volatility (2.18%) compared to GPTCX (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPTCX dropped -20.89% vs SIFAX's -23.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.