GPT vs. POW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GPT (Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GPT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Intelligent Alpha, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GPT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

GPT vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF (GPT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPT achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.

GPT

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -1.56%
• 6M: 7.83%
• YTD: 11.42%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -13.79%
• 6M: 25.01%
• YTD: 35.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPT vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GPT Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF	11.42%	-1.70%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	35.68%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GPT and POW is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

GPT vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPT

GPT Risk / Return Rank: 60
GPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
GPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
GPT Omega Ratio Rank: 50
GPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GPT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPT vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF (GPT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GPT	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.01	—	—

Drawdowns

GPT vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPT drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPT and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPT	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.59%	-20.28%	-5.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-20.28%	+17.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.10%	-4.56%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GPT	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.45%	33.06%	-14.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.62%	33.06%	-12.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.62%	33.06%	-12.44%

GPT vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPT vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

GPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GPT Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF	0.68%	0.75%	0.19%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPT and POW in my portfolio?

GPT and POW have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GPT or POW?

On fees, GPT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPT or POW?

GPT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GPT or POW?

GPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between GPT and POW?

GPT is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Intelligent Alpha and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for GPT and 0.75% for POW.