PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPSTX vs. FIQOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPSTX vs. FIQOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPSTX achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly lower than FIQOX's 24.23% return.


GPSTX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.71%
YTD
11.52%
6M
10.65%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
20.07%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
12.36%

FIQOX

1D
0.35%
1M
6.11%
YTD
24.23%
6M
23.22%
1Y
42.77%
3Y*
31.96%
5Y*
16.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPSTX vs. FIQOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GPSTX
GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund
11.52%19.64%17.49%24.10%-22.19%19.33%19.40%25.67%-9.25%
FIQOX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z
24.23%16.27%46.05%25.10%-25.64%18.58%31.08%29.13%-10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GPSTX and FIQOX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.92

The correlation between GPSTX and FIQOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPSTX vs. FIQOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPSTX
GPSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GPSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GPSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQOX
FIQOX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FIQOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPSTX vs. FIQOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPSTXFIQOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

3.75

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.43

15.90

-3.47

GPSTX vs. FIQOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPSTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the FIQOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPSTX and FIQOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPSTX vs. FIQOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPSTX drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, roughly equal to the maximum FIQOX drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPSTX and FIQOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPSTXFIQOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.18%

-33.64%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-11.74%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-22.59%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.30%

-33.64%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

0.00%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-7.81%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.76%

-0.51%

Volatility

GPSTX vs. FIQOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) is 5.29%, while Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z (FIQOX) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that GPSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPSTXFIQOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

7.74%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

15.12%

-3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

18.68%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

20.26%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

21.26%

-3.89%

GPSTX vs. FIQOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPSTX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FIQOX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPSTX vs. FIQOX - Dividend Comparison

GPSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than FIQOX's 9.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQOX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class Z
9.34%11.60%26.02%1.10%6.51%12.99%8.23%5.09%9.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GPSTX
GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund
4.26%4.75%4.45%2.00%4.13%2.65%1.82%1.11%1.40%12.56%4.21%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GPSTX and FIQOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIQOX has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to GPSTX (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPSTX dropped -33.18% vs FIQOX's -33.64%.

FIQOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPSTX and FIQOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer