GPSTX vs. AGOCX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GPSTX (GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund) and AGOCX (PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GPSTX returned 12.15%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for AGOCX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GPSTX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for AGOCX.

Performance

GPSTX vs. AGOCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) and PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund (AGOCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPSTX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than AGOCX's 18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GPSTX has outperformed AGOCX with an annualized return of 12.15%, while AGOCX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.51% annualized return.

GPSTX

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 9.45%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 22.70%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: 12.15%

AGOCX

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 18.43%
• 6M: 17.68%
• 1Y: 32.05%
• 3Y*: 21.41%
• 5Y*: 11.94%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPSTX vs. AGOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GPSTX GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund	9.45%	19.64%	17.49%	24.10%	-22.19%	19.33%	19.40%	25.67%	-10.35%	21.98%
AGOCX PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund	18.43%	23.91%	13.75%	9.41%	-11.69%	20.27%	5.72%	21.02%	-7.69%	14.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GPSTX and AGOCX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.88

The correlation between GPSTX and AGOCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GPSTX vs. AGOCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPSTX

GPSTX Risk / Return Rank: 50
GPSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
GPSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GPSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
GPSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GPSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

AGOCX

AGOCX Risk / Return Rank: 88
AGOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
AGOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AGOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AGOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
AGOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPSTX vs. AGOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) and PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund (AGOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GPSTX	AGOCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.65	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	3.68	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.48	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	4.04	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.83	16.23	-5.40

GPSTX vs. AGOCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the AGOCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPSTX and AGOCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GPSTX vs. AGOCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPSTX drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, smaller than the maximum AGOCX drawdown of -51.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPSTX and AGOCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPSTX	AGOCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.18%	-51.84%	+18.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	-8.25%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.04%	-11.60%	-6.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.30%	-24.53%	-5.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.18%	-34.69%	+1.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.51%	-1.46%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.65%	-7.85%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	2.05%	+0.21%

Volatility

GPSTX vs. AGOCX - Volatility Comparison

GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund (GPSTX) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund (AGOCX) at 5.08%. This indicates that GPSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPSTX	AGOCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	5.08%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.39%	10.83%	+0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.96%	12.58%	+1.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.18%	14.13%	+3.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.32%	15.91%	+1.41%

GPSTX vs. AGOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPSTX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than AGOCX's 1.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPSTX vs. AGOCX - Dividend Comparison

GPSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than AGOCX's 8.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGOCX PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund	8.04%	9.59%	10.04%	9.74%	9.10%	5.29%	9.25%	12.44%	23.46%	5.31%	1.56%	12.12%
GPSTX GuidePath Growth Allocation Fund	4.34%	4.75%	4.45%	2.00%	4.13%	2.65%	1.82%	1.11%	1.40%	12.56%	4.21%	2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPSTX and AGOCX in my portfolio?

GPSTX and AGOCX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPSTX or AGOCX?

GPSTX has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to AGOCX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPSTX dropped -33.18% vs AGOCX's -51.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGOCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.