PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPSCX vs. NBGNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPSCX vs. NBGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund (GPSCX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GPSCX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBGNX

1D
0.49%
1M
2.96%
6M
5.49%
YTD
11.83%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
3.15%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPSCX vs. NBGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPSCX
Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund
0.00%-13.27%24.26%7.27%-37.24%-7.96%37.80%38.52%-8.92%37.59%
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
11.83%-4.70%9.04%15.57%-19.49%18.07%24.86%29.47%-6.91%15.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GPSCX and NBGNX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998

0.86

The correlation between GPSCX and NBGNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (3 years) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPSCX vs. NBGNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPSCX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


NBGNX
NBGNX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NBGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPSCX vs. NBGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund (GPSCX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPSCXNBGNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

GPSCX vs. NBGNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPSCX vs. NBGNX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPSCXNBGNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

Volatility

GPSCX vs. NBGNX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPSCXNBGNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

GPSCX vs. NBGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPSCX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than NBGNX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPSCX vs. NBGNX - Dividend Comparison

GPSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NBGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPSCX
Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund
0.00%0.48%0.00%0.00%11.02%24.10%22.25%11.69%33.03%5.00%0.00%40.41%
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
14.63%16.36%2.15%3.03%11.05%10.92%3.84%5.82%12.24%13.89%11.21%18.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPSCX and NBGNX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPSCX and NBGNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer