GPSCX vs. CTSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GPSCX (Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund) and CTSIX (Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GPSCX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CTSIX.

Performance

GPSCX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund (GPSCX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GPSCX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CTSIX

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: 11.15%
• YTD: 35.59%
• 6M: 35.33%
• 1Y: 68.24%
• 3Y*: 35.13%
• 5Y*: 11.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPSCX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GPSCX Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund	0.00%	-13.27%	24.26%	7.27%	-37.24%	-7.96%	37.80%	8.10%
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	35.59%	25.90%	44.34%	7.57%	-37.30%	9.12%	63.38%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GPSCX and CTSIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019	0.82

The correlation between GPSCX and CTSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GPSCX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTSIX

CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 75
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPSCX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund (GPSCX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPSCX	CTSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.57	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GPSCX	CTSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-50.83%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.38%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.64%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GPSCX	CTSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	27.70%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	28.00%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	29.78%	—

GPSCX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPSCX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPSCX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither GPSCX nor CTSIX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.77%	4.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GPSCX Victory RS Small Cap Equity Fund	0.00%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	11.02%	24.10%	22.25%	11.69%	33.03%	5.00%	0.00%	40.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPSCX and CTSIX in my portfolio?

GPSCX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.