GPROX vs. MFWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX).
GPROX is managed by Grandeur Peak Funds. It was launched on Jun 18, 2013. MFWIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.
Performance
GPROX vs. MFWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPROX vs. MFWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPROX Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund | -8.35% | 8.87% | 5.51% | 14.86% | -34.54% | 19.78% | 41.16% | 29.39% | -15.86% | 30.73% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | -0.47% | 15.70% | 4.25% | 10.52% | -10.62% | 8.59% | 9.63% | 18.49% | -6.96% | 15.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPROX achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly lower than MFWIX's -0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GPROX has outperformed MFWIX with an annualized return of 7.52%, while MFWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.19% annualized return.
GPROX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -10.62%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 6M
- -8.03%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
MFWIX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPROX vs. MFWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPROX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MFWIX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPROX vs. MFWIX — Risk / Return Rank
GPROX
MFWIX
GPROX vs. MFWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPROX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 1.29 | -1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 1.77 | -1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.25 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 1.59 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | 6.26 | -5.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPROX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 1.29 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.52 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.65 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.71 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPROX and MFWIX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GPROX vs. MFWIX - Dividend Comparison
GPROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.48%, more than MFWIX's 8.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPROX Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund | 21.48% | 19.69% | 12.03% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 15.32% | 8.09% | 2.58% | 11.25% | 1.49% | 0.13% | 3.75% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 8.81% | 8.77% | 9.36% | 3.98% | 2.94% | 10.71% | 7.53% | 4.70% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 1.40% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
GPROX vs. MFWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPROX drawdown since its inception was -43.86%, which is greater than MFWIX's maximum drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPROX and MFWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPROX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.86% | -33.01% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -6.85% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.86% | -20.22% | -23.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.86% | -23.36% | -20.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.60% | -6.50% | -18.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -3.83% | -9.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 1.74% | +1.82% |
Volatility
GPROX vs. MFWIX - Volatility Comparison
Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund (GPROX) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) at 3.04%. This indicates that GPROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPROX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 3.04% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 5.25% | +4.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 8.85% | +6.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 9.09% | +8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 9.60% | +7.35% |