GPRF vs. WTIU
GPRF (Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - GPRF is a Preferred Stock fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GPRF returned 4.03% vs 104.76% for WTIU. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GPRF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
GPRF vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPRF achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 95.37% return.
GPRF
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.03%
WTIU
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 39.23%
- 6M
- 55.77%
- YTD
- 95.37%
- 1Y
- 104.76%
- 3Y*
- -1.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $179.35K | $1.44M | $844.22K | |
| $1.41M | $930.94K | $851.49K |
GPRF vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | 1.40% | 6.17% | 2.49% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 95.37% | -17.13% | -41.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPRF and WTIU is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | -0.01 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GPRF and WTIU has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPRF vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
GPRF
WTIU
GPRF vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPRF | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 2.19 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.33 | 4.99 | -0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPRF vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPRF | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -75.73% | +71.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -48.11% | +43.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -30.75% | +30.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -39.20% | +38.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 21.07% | -20.14% |
Volatility
GPRF vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) is 0.94%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 22.17%. This indicates that GPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPRF | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 22.17% | -21.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 57.97% | -54.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 69.79% | -66.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 70.86% | -67.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 70.86% | -67.00% |
GPRF vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPRF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPRF vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | 5.66% | 5.38% | 2.10% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPRF and WTIU have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTIU has higher volatility (22.17%) compared to GPRF (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPRF dropped -4.36% vs WTIU's -75.73%.
On 1-year performance, WTIU leads with 104.76% vs 4.03% for GPRF. On fees, GPRF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GPRF has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 104.76% return vs 4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPRF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.
GPRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
GPRF is categorized as Preferred Stock, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. GPRF tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index, while WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GPRF and 0.95% for WTIU.
WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPRF and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer