GPRF vs. PQDI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI).

GPRF and PQDI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GPRF is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 2024. PQDI is a passively managed fund by Principal that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA 7% Constrained DRD Eligible Preferred Securities Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2020. Both GPRF and PQDI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GPRF vs. PQDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GPRF vs. PQDI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF	-0.71%	6.17%	2.34%
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF	-0.68%	8.46%	3.20%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GPRF having a -0.71% return and PQDI slightly higher at -0.68%.

GPRF

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: -0.71%
• 6M: -0.58%
• 1Y: 4.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQDI

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -2.06%
• YTD: -0.68%
• 6M: 0.73%
• 1Y: 6.50%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 3.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPRF vs. PQDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPRF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PQDI's 0.60% expense ratio.

PQDI

Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF

GPRF

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF

Return for Risk

GPRF vs. PQDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPRF

GPRF Risk / Return Rank: 57
GPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
GPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
GPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
GPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 50

PQDI

PQDI Risk / Return Rank: 86
PQDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PQDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PQDI Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PQDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PQDI Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPRF vs. PQDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPRF	PQDI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	2.03	-0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	2.75	-1.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.43	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	1.93	-0.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.94	8.63	-3.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPRF vs. PQDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPRF Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the PQDI Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPRF and PQDI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPRF	PQDI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	2.03	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	0.98	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between GPRF and PQDI is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GPRF vs. PQDI - Dividend Comparison

GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than PQDI's 5.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF	5.53%	5.38%	2.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PQDI Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF	5.16%	5.02%	4.93%	5.35%	5.60%	5.21%	2.69%

Drawdowns

GPRF vs. PQDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum PQDI drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and PQDI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPRF	PQDI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-17.41%	+13.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.20%	-3.31%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.78%	-2.46%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-3.59%	+2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.74%	+0.18%

Volatility

GPRF vs. PQDI - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to Principal Spectrum Preferred and Income ETF (PQDI) at 1.87%. This indicates that GPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPRF	PQDI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.34%	1.87%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.11%	2.49%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.18%	3.22%	+0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.03%	4.64%	-0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.03%	4.57%	-0.54%