GPRF vs. PFXF
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF).
GPRF and PFXF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GPRF is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 2024. PFXF is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index. It was launched on Jul 16, 2012. Both GPRF and PFXF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GPRF vs. PFXF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPRF vs. PFXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | -0.71% | 6.17% | 2.34% |
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 0.10% | 9.64% | 3.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPRF achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than PFXF's 0.10% return.
GPRF
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFXF
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPRF vs. PFXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPRF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PFXF's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPRF vs. PFXF — Risk / Return Rank
GPRF
PFXF
GPRF vs. PFXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPRF | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.63 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.22 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 1.66 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 5.98 | -1.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPRF | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.44 | +0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPRF and PFXF is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GPRF vs. PFXF - Dividend Comparison
GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than PFXF's 6.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | 5.53% | 5.38% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 6.96% | 6.72% | 7.82% | 7.88% | 6.74% | 4.66% | 5.19% | 5.35% | 6.56% | 5.93% | 5.81% | 5.99% |
Drawdowns
GPRF vs. PFXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum PFXF drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and PFXF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPRF | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -35.49% | +31.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -6.84% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -4.75% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -3.94% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 1.90% | -0.98% |
Volatility
GPRF vs. PFXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) is 2.34%, while VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that GPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPRF | PFXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 3.58% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.11% | 6.82% | -3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 10.83% | -6.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.03% | 10.81% | -6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.03% | 13.16% | -9.13% |