GPRF vs. PFLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD).
GPRF and PFLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GPRF is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 2024. PFLD is a passively managed fund by Advisors Asset Management that tracks the performance of the ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2019. Both GPRF and PFLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GPRF vs. PFLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPRF vs. PFLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | -0.71% | 6.17% | 2.34% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPRF achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than PFLD's 0.25% return.
GPRF
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFLD
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 1.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.88%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPRF vs. PFLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GPRF and PFLD have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Return for Risk
GPRF vs. PFLD — Risk / Return Rank
GPRF
PFLD
GPRF vs. PFLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPRF | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.33 | +0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 0.48 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.07 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.30 | +0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 1.09 | +3.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPRF | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.33 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.14 | +1.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPRF and PFLD is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GPRF vs. PFLD - Dividend Comparison
GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than PFLD's 6.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF | 5.53% | 5.38% | 2.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 6.05% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
GPRF vs. PFLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum PFLD drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and PFLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPRF | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -33.20% | +28.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -4.06% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -1.67% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -4.28% | +3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 1.12% | -0.20% |
Volatility
GPRF vs. PFLD - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) at 1.14%. This indicates that GPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPRF | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 1.14% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.11% | 2.22% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 5.28% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.03% | 7.49% | -3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.03% | 13.55% | -9.52% |