GPRF vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GPRF (Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GPRF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Preferred Stock and Hybrids Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. GPRF is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, GPRF returned 6.57% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. GPRF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

GPRF vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPRF achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.

GPRF

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 6.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPRF vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF	1.33%	6.17%	2.34%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GPRF and CSHP is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024	-0.06

GPRF vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GPRF	CSHP
Financial Services	20.6%	0.1%
Real Estate	3.4%	-
Utilities	2.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.9%	-
Communication Services	0.5%	-
Industrials	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

GPRF vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPRF

GPRF Risk / Return Rank: 49
GPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
GPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPRF vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPRF	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	11.91	-10.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	31.26	-28.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	7.44	-6.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	65.71	-64.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.51	432.16	-424.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPRF vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPRF Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPRF and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPRF	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	11.91	-10.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.37	10.75	-9.38

Drawdowns

GPRF vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPRF drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPRF and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPRF	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-0.08%	-4.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.20%	-0.06%	-4.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	0.00%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.89%	-0.00%	-0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.01%	+0.87%

Volatility

GPRF vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF (GPRF) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that GPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPRF	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	0.07%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	0.24%	+2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76%	0.33%	+3.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.94%	0.40%	+3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.94%	0.40%	+3.54%

GPRF vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPRF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

GPRF vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

GPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%
GPRF Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Preferred Stock and Hybrid Securities ETF	5.65%	5.38%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GPRF and CSHP in my portfolio?

GPRF and CSHP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GPRF or CSHP?

GPRF has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPRF dropped -4.36% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, GPRF or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, GPRF leads with 6.57% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GPRF or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, GPRF has performed better with a 6.57% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GPRF or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GPRF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GPRF or CSHP?

GPRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 3.92% for CSHP.

What is the main difference between GPRF and CSHP?

GPRF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GPRF and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.