GPN vs. WSM
GPN (Global Payments Inc.) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) are both stocks. GPN operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, GPN returned -0.28%/yr vs 27.10%/yr for WSM. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPN vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPN achieves a -11.90% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 26.06% return. Over the past 10 years, GPN has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of -0.28%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 27.10% annualized return.
GPN
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 6M
- -16.89%
- 1Y
- -12.09%
- 3Y*
- -11.36%
- 5Y*
- -18.15%
- 10Y*
- -0.28%
WSM
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 29.92%
- YTD
- 26.06%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 46.51%
- 3Y*
- 53.75%
- 5Y*
- 23.70%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
GPN vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPN Global Payments Inc. | -11.90% | -30.11% | -10.97% | 29.02% | -25.91% | -36.91% | 18.51% | 77.25% | 2.92% | 44.49% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 26.06% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPN and WSM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2001 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
GPN:
-$3.90
WSM:
$8.93
GPN:
1.39
WSM:
3.46
GPN:
$8.83B
WSM:
$7.88B
GPN:
$4.25B
WSM:
$3.63B
GPN:
$2.27B
WSM:
$1.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPN vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank
GPN
WSM
GPN vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Payments Inc. (GPN) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPN | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.23 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 2.01 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 4.55 | -5.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPN vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPN drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, smaller than the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPN and WSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPN | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.17% | -89.01% | +18.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.95% | -23.27% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.95% | -36.79% | -17.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.52% | -51.92% | -14.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.17% | -59.71% | -10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.54% | 0.00% | -67.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -25.03% | +6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.92% | 10.25% | +4.67% |
Volatility
GPN vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
Global Payments Inc. (GPN) has a higher volatility of 13.23% compared to Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) at 12.02%. This indicates that GPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPN | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.23% | 12.02% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.58% | 25.57% | +5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.63% | 34.63% | +5.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.64% | 44.77% | -8.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.55% | 44.26% | -9.71% |
Dividends
GPN vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
GPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than WSM's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPN Global Payments Inc. | 1.85% | 1.29% | 0.89% | 0.79% | 1.01% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 0.12% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.06% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
GPN vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Payments Inc. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPN vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison
GPN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
GPN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported an operating income of -15.65M and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.5%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
GPN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Payments Inc. reported a net income of -1.80B and revenue of 2.97B, resulting in a net margin of -60.6%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPN and WSM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPN has higher volatility (13.23%) compared to WSM (12.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPN dropped -70.17% vs WSM's -89.01%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPN and WSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer