PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPMT vs. LFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GPMT vs. LFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) and Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPMT achieves a -43.04% return, which is significantly lower than LFT's -26.79% return.


GPMT

1D
-6.38%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
-43.04%
6M
-42.55%
1Y
-40.12%
3Y*
-30.22%
5Y*
-31.48%
10Y*

LFT

1D
-2.91%
1M
-12.28%
YTD
-26.79%
6M
-27.77%
1Y
-54.81%
3Y*
-8.68%
5Y*
-15.79%
10Y*
-3.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPMT vs. LFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
-43.04%-7.03%-49.00%28.79%-48.31%26.55%-41.53%11.51%11.09%0.98%
LFT
Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
-26.79%-39.33%29.40%38.64%-45.07%28.63%15.69%23.31%-22.06%-10.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GPMT and LFT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GPMT:

$62.93M

LFT:

$52.40M

EPS

GPMT:

-$0.85

LFT:

-$0.06

PS Ratio

GPMT:

0.47

LFT:

0.92

PB Ratio

GPMT:

0.12

LFT:

0.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

GPMT:

$132.94M

LFT:

$56.81M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GPMT:

$74.25M

LFT:

$63.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

GPMT:

$16.09M

LFT:

$37.56M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPMT vs. LFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPMT
GPMT Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GPMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPMT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GPMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPMT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

LFT
LFT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
LFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFT Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPMT vs. LFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) and Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPMTLFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.78

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

-1.00

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

-1.57

+0.25

GPMT vs. LFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPMT Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is comparable to the LFT Sharpe Ratio of -1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPMT and LFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPMT vs. LFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPMT drawdown since its inception was -87.96%, which is greater than LFT's maximum drawdown of -81.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPMT and LFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPMTLFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.96%

-81.57%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.89%

-55.07%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.35%

-59.51%

-14.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.73%

-59.51%

-26.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.91%

-61.22%

-25.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.82%

-33.00%

-7.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.41%

34.92%

-4.51%

Volatility

GPMT vs. LFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT) is 11.67%, while Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) has a volatility of 13.71%. This indicates that GPMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPMTLFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.67%

13.71%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.85%

33.38%

+3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.94%

47.45%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.83%

35.31%

+8.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.52%

41.48%

+44.04%

Dividends

GPMT vs. LFT - Dividend Comparison

GPMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.15%, less than LFT's 18.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
15.15%8.33%10.75%13.47%17.72%8.54%6.51%9.14%8.99%3.95%0.00%0.00%
LFT
Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
18.00%15.60%15.50%11.16%12.63%9.38%11.16%9.13%9.79%13.75%41.20%24.73%

Financials

GPMT vs. LFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. and Lument Finance Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M20222023202420252026
26.04M
0
(GPMT) Total Revenue
(LFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GPMT and LFT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFT has higher volatility (13.71%) compared to GPMT (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPMT dropped -87.96% vs LFT's -81.57%.

GPMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPMT and LFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer