PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIX vs. QQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIX vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 14.57% return.


GPIX

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.27%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.34%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQA

1D
-0.10%
1M
7.03%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.20%
1Y
32.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIX vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
9.91%16.25%6.83%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
14.57%17.24%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and QQA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024

0.89

The correlation between GPIX and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

GPIX vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPIX
QQA

Technology

35.5%
53.8%

Financial Services

11.6%
0.2%

Communication Services

11.5%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
4.2%

Industrials

8.4%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
7.7%

Energy

3.5%
0.6%

Utilities

2.4%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Technology

GPIX
35.5%
QQA
53.8%

Financial Services

GPIX
11.6%
QQA
0.2%

Communication Services

GPIX
11.5%
QQA
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GPIX
10.1%
QQA
12.3%

Healthcare

GPIX
8.4%
QQA
4.2%

Industrials

GPIX
8.4%
QQA
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

GPIX
4.9%
QQA
7.7%

Energy

GPIX
3.5%
QQA
0.6%

Utilities

GPIX
2.4%
QQA
1.4%

Real Estate

GPIX
2.0%
QQA
0.1%

Basic Materials

GPIX
1.8%
QQA
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIX vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

QQA
QQA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPIXQQADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

3.70

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.77

16.59

+0.18

GPIX vs. QQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the QQA Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and QQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPIXQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.57

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

1.18

+0.61

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and QQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIXQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-19.73%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-8.76%

+1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.10%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-2.44%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.95%

-0.42%

Volatility

GPIX vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is 2.26%, while Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that GPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIXQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

2.91%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

9.68%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

12.59%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

18.27%

-4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.80%

18.27%

-4.47%

GPIX vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GPIX and QQA have an expense ratio of 0.29%.


Dividends

GPIX vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, less than QQA's 9.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.00%8.01%7.45%1.40%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
9.29%9.78%4.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GPIX and QQA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQA has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to GPIX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIX dropped -17.50% vs QQA's -19.73%.

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 32.22% vs 25.55% for GPIX. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 32.22% return vs 25.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIX and QQA have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.

QQA has the higher dividend yield at 9.29%, compared with 8.00% for GPIX.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco.

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIX and QQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer