PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIX vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIX vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.


GPIX

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.27%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.34%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
4.91%
1M
72.80%
YTD
192.40%
6M
186.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIX vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
9.91%8.14%
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
192.40%34.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and AMDW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.54

GPIX vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPIX
AMDW

Technology

35.5%
28.6%

Financial Services

11.6%

-

Communication Services

11.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

GPIX
35.5%
AMDW
28.6%

Financial Services

GPIX
11.6%
AMDW

-

Communication Services

GPIX
11.5%
AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

GPIX
10.1%
AMDW

-

Healthcare

GPIX
8.4%
AMDW

-

Industrials

GPIX
8.4%
AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

GPIX
4.9%
AMDW

-

Energy

GPIX
3.5%
AMDW

-

Utilities

GPIX
2.4%
AMDW

-

Real Estate

GPIX
2.0%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

GPIX
1.8%
AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIX vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPIXAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.77

GPIX vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPIXAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

4.83

-3.05

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIXAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-34.64%

+17.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-14.66%

+13.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

Volatility

GPIX vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIXAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

81.56%

-71.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

81.56%

-67.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.80%

81.56%

-67.76%

GPIX vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPIX vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, less than AMDW's 28.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
28.98%34.78%0.00%0.00%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.00%8.01%7.45%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIX and AMDW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 8.00% for GPIX.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIX and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIX and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer