GPIQ vs. QCLR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR).

GPIQ and QCLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GPIQ is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Oct 24, 2023. QCLR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.

Performance

GPIQ vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GPIQ vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	-3.90%	19.77%	23.22%	15.38%
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF	-6.67%	11.27%	20.27%	14.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIQ achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's -6.67% return.

GPIQ

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: -3.94%
• YTD: -3.90%
• 6M: -0.56%
• 1Y: 23.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCLR

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: -6.67%
• 6M: -5.64%
• 1Y: 10.86%
• 3Y*: 12.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPIQ vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.

QCLR

Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF

GPIQ

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF

Return for Risk

GPIQ vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 76
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 84

QCLR

QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 48
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIQ vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GPIQ	QCLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	0.91	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.35	+0.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.17	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.06	+0.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.84	4.33	+4.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GPIQ vs. QCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the QCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIQ and QCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GPIQ	QCLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	0.91	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	0.53	+0.75

Correlation

The correlation between GPIQ and QCLR is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GPIQ vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison

GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, less than QCLR's 15.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	10.68%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF	15.95%	14.89%	8.89%	0.47%	0.27%	1.64%

Drawdowns

GPIQ vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, roughly equal to the maximum QCLR drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and QCLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GPIQ	QCLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.06%	-21.77%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.08%	-10.22%	-1.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.63%	-8.78%	+2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-6.32%	+3.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	2.50%	+0.12%

Volatility

GPIQ vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 3.86%. This indicates that GPIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GPIQ	QCLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.08%	3.86%	+2.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.17%	8.53%	+2.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.42%	12.06%	+8.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.74%	12.61%	+5.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.74%	12.61%	+5.13%