PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIQ vs. JUST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPIQ vs. JUST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GPIQ having a 15.41% return and JUST slightly lower at 15.37%.


GPIQ

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.86%
6M
16.15%
YTD
15.41%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
27.47%

JUST

1D
-0.09%
1M
3.44%
6M
14.24%
YTD
15.37%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
21.77%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$96.19M$82.14M$83.71M
$426.25K$476.15K$729.52K

GPIQ vs. JUST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
15.41%19.77%23.22%15.17%
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
15.37%17.60%23.73%14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GPIQ and JUST is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023

0.90

The correlation between GPIQ and JUST has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

GPIQ vs. JUST - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GPIQ
JUST

Technology

60.7%
37.6%

Communication Services

11.8%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
5.1%

Industrials

4.2%
7.9%

Healthcare

3.7%
9.2%

Utilities

1.4%
2.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.1%

Energy

0.5%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
13.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.1%

Technology

GPIQ
60.7%
JUST
37.6%

Communication Services

GPIQ
11.8%
JUST
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GPIQ
10.1%
JUST
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

GPIQ
6.4%
JUST
5.1%

Industrials

GPIQ
4.2%
JUST
7.9%

Healthcare

GPIQ
3.7%
JUST
9.2%

Utilities

GPIQ
1.4%
JUST
2.5%

Basic Materials

GPIQ
1.1%
JUST
2.1%

Energy

GPIQ
0.5%
JUST
3.5%

Financial Services

GPIQ
0.2%
JUST
13.2%

Real Estate

GPIQ
0.1%
JUST
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPIQ vs. JUST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GPIQ
GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

JUST
JUST Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
JUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUST Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
JUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUST Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GPIQ vs. JUST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GPIQJUSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.96

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

12.85

-2.82

GPIQ vs. JUST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the JUST Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIQ and JUST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GPIQ vs. JUST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum JUST drawdown of -33.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and JUST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIQJUSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-33.83%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-8.76%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-0.09%

-2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-5.03%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.01%

+0.69%

Volatility

GPIQ vs. JUST - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) at 3.94%. This indicates that GPIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JUST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPIQJUSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

3.94%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

10.11%

+4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

12.74%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

16.90%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

19.03%

-0.92%

GPIQ vs. JUST - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than JUST's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPIQ vs. JUST - Dividend Comparison

GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.95%, more than JUST's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
9.95%9.81%9.18%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.92%1.02%1.11%1.37%1.51%1.07%1.36%1.86%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPIQ and JUST have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPIQ has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to JUST (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIQ dropped -21.06% vs JUST's -33.83%.

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 27.03% vs 25.83% for JUST. On fees, JUST is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JUST has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 27.03% return vs 25.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JUST is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.95%, compared with 0.92% for JUST.

GPIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while JUST is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIQ and 0.20% for JUST.

JUST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPIQ and JUST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer