GPIQ vs. COMT
GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. GPIQ is actively managed, while COMT is passively managed. Over the past year, GPIQ returned 21.40% vs 36.27% for COMT. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GPIQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
GPIQ vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPIQ achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 33.14% return.
GPIQ
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 21.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.03%
COMT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 24.14%
- YTD
- 33.14%
- 1Y
- 36.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.60M | $11.19M | $14.65M | |
| $68.84M | $77.85M | $80.88M |
GPIQ vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 10.98% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.17% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 33.14% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPIQ and COMT is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.02 |
The correlation between GPIQ and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPIQ vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
GPIQ
COMT
GPIQ vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPIQ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 1.99 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.75 | 6.40 | +2.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPIQ vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPIQ drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIQ and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPIQ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.06% | -51.89% | +30.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.51% | -17.57% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -9.27% | +2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -23.93% | +21.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 5.46% | -2.99% |
Volatility
GPIQ vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) at 4.67%. This indicates that GPIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPIQ | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 4.67% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.56% | 19.58% | -6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.22% | 21.55% | -5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 21.07% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 18.85% | -0.88% |
GPIQ vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPIQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
GPIQ vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.18%, more than COMT's 5.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.81% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 10.18% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GPIQ and COMT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPIQ has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to COMT (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPIQ dropped -21.06% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 36.27% vs 21.40% for GPIQ. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 36.27% return vs 21.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.18%, compared with 5.81% for COMT.
GPIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GPIQ and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPIQ and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer