GPGI vs. CRS
GPGI (GPGI, Inc.) and CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — GPGI in Conglomerates, CRS in Metal Fabrication. Over the past 5 years, GPGI returned 10.55%/yr vs 70.73%/yr for CRS. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GPGI vs. CRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPGI achieves a -31.51% return, which is significantly lower than CRS's 65.23% return.
GPGI
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -21.19%
- 6M
- -43.98%
- YTD
- -31.51%
- 1Y
- -4.80%
- 3Y*
- 31.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.70%
CRS
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -12.99%
- 6M
- 63.58%
- YTD
- 65.23%
- 1Y
- 102.13%
- 3Y*
- 106.41%
- 5Y*
- 70.73%
- 10Y*
- 32.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $455.19M | $399.26M | $397.99M | |
GPGI GPGI, Inc. | $17.22M | $19.68M | $30.94M |
GPGI vs. CRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPGI GPGI, Inc. | -31.51% | 51.42% | 197.34% | 9.98% | -40.19% | -18.79% | 2.85% |
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 65.23% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | 12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPGI and CRS is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
GPGI:
$3.83B
CRS:
$25.82B
GPGI:
-$2.23
CRS:
$10.53
GPGI:
1.23
CRS:
11.71
GPGI:
$0.00
CRS:
$3.12B
GPGI:
-$2.00K
CRS:
$955.40M
GPGI:
-$314.11M
CRS:
$797.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPGI vs. CRS — Risk / Return Rank
GPGI
CRS
GPGI vs. CRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GPGI, Inc. (GPGI) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPGI | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.37 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 5.87 | -6.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 20.89 | -21.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPGI vs. CRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPGI drawdown since its inception was -59.12%, smaller than the maximum CRS drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPGI and CRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPGI | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.12% | -84.68% | +25.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.68% | -18.66% | -37.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.68% | -28.74% | -26.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.39% | -41.86% | -15.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.22% | -16.08% | -33.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.08% | -27.16% | +3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.95% | 5.23% | +22.72% |
Volatility
GPGI vs. CRS - Volatility Comparison
GPGI, Inc. (GPGI) has a higher volatility of 15.89% compared to Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) at 14.21%. This indicates that GPGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPGI | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.89% | 14.21% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.85% | 33.58% | +18.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.06% | 50.12% | +11.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.39% | 46.58% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.29% | 48.87% | -0.58% |
Dividends
GPGI vs. CRS - Dividend Comparison
GPGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than CRS's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
GPGI GPGI, Inc. | 0.04% | 0.00% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GPGI vs. CRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GPGI, Inc. and Carpenter Technology Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GPGI and CRS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPGI has higher volatility (15.89%) compared to CRS (14.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPGI dropped -59.12% vs CRS's -84.68%.
CRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPGI and CRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer