GPC vs. AWR
GPC (Genuine Parts Company) and AWR (American States Water Company) are both stocks. GPC operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while AWR operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, GPC returned 3.05%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for AWR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPC vs. AWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPC achieves a -19.47% return, which is significantly lower than AWR's 7.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GPC has underperformed AWR with an annualized return of 3.05%, while AWR has yielded a comparatively higher 8.51% annualized return.
GPC
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- -19.47%
- 6M
- -22.86%
- 1Y
- -19.74%
- 3Y*
- -11.88%
- 5Y*
- -2.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.05%
AWR
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- -3.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.51%
GPC vs. AWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPC Genuine Parts Company | -19.47% | 8.70% | -13.22% | -18.12% | 26.82% | 43.39% | -2.19% | 14.05% | 4.11% | 2.45% |
AWR American States Water Company | 7.54% | -4.32% | -1.18% | -11.43% | -8.92% | 32.25% | -6.75% | 31.19% | 17.91% | 29.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPC and AWR is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990 | 0.26 |
The correlation between GPC and AWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GPC:
$13.40B
AWR:
$3.01B
GPC:
$0.43
AWR:
$3.44
GPC:
224.37
AWR:
22.34
GPC:
0.55
AWR:
4.39
GPC:
2.99
AWR:
2.83
GPC:
$24.70B
AWR:
$679.25M
GPC:
$8.93B
AWR:
$303.17M
GPC:
$760.95M
AWR:
$233.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPC vs. AWR — Risk / Return Rank
GPC
AWR
GPC vs. AWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genuine Parts Company (GPC) and American States Water Company (AWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPC | AWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.04 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.26 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | 0.47 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPC | AWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | 0.15 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.05 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.33 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.39 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
GPC vs. AWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPC drawdown since its inception was -54.89%, which is greater than AWR's maximum drawdown of -37.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPC and AWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPC | AWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.89% | -37.39% | -17.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.48% | -11.55% | -25.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.81% | -25.36% | -15.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.70% | -32.85% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.89% | -32.85% | -22.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.38% | -17.98% | -24.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -10.81% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.89% | 6.41% | +10.48% |
Volatility
GPC vs. AWR - Volatility Comparison
Genuine Parts Company (GPC) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to American States Water Company (AWR) at 4.82%. This indicates that GPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPC | AWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 4.82% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.04% | 15.05% | +9.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.95% | 20.12% | +8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.92% | 22.65% | +4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.12% | 26.16% | +1.96% |
Dividends
GPC vs. AWR - Dividend Comparison
GPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than AWR's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWR American States Water Company | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.30% | 2.06% | 1.65% | 1.35% | 1.61% | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 2.01% | 2.08% |
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 4.31% | 3.35% | 3.43% | 2.74% | 2.06% | 2.33% | 3.15% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 2.75% | 2.86% |
Financials
GPC vs. AWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genuine Parts Company and American States Water Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GPC vs. AWR - Profitability Comparison
GPC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a gross profit of 2.34B and revenue of 6.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.
AWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American States Water Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 169.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GPC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported an operating income of 286.27M and revenue of 6.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.
AWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American States Water Company reported an operating income of 51.37M and revenue of 169.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.4%.
GPC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genuine Parts Company reported a net income of 188.54M and revenue of 6.26B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
AWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American States Water Company reported a net income of 29.95M and revenue of 169.19M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GPC and AWR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPC has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to AWR (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPC dropped -54.89% vs AWR's -37.39%.
AWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPC and AWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer