GPC vs. FANG
Compare and contrast key facts about Genuine Parts Company (GPC) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GPC or FANG.
Correlation
The correlation between GPC and FANG is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GPC vs. FANG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GPC:
-0.48
FANG:
0.06
GPC:
-0.44
FANG:
0.28
GPC:
0.92
FANG:
1.04
GPC:
-0.41
FANG:
0.07
GPC:
-1.10
FANG:
0.19
GPC:
13.70%
FANG:
9.07%
GPC:
31.66%
FANG:
28.18%
GPC:
-54.89%
FANG:
-88.72%
GPC:
-35.38%
FANG:
-26.20%
Fundamentals
GPC:
$16.47B
FANG:
$46.76B
GPC:
$7.76
FANG:
$17.33
GPC:
15.27
FANG:
9.24
GPC:
4.76
FANG:
1.20
GPC:
$23.30B
FANG:
$9.57B
GPC:
$8.30B
FANG:
$6.02B
GPC:
$1.89B
FANG:
$6.66B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPC achieves a -14.81% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GPC has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 3.66%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.19% annualized return.
GPC
-14.81%
-4.71%
-17.70%
-13.79%
4.46%
3.66%
FANG
3.09%
-15.02%
-19.23%
2.60%
16.74%
12.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GPC vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genuine Parts Company (GPC) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GPC vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison
GPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than FANG's 5.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 3.49% | 2.74% | 2.06% | 2.33% | 3.15% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 2.75% | 2.86% | 2.16% | 2.58% |
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 5.42% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GPC vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPC drawdown since its inception was -54.89%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPC and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GPC vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is 6.78%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that GPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GPC vs. FANG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genuine Parts Company and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities