GPC vs. FANG

In the year-to-date period, GPC achieves a -10.97% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 22.22% return. Over the past 10 years, GPC has underperformed FANG with an annualized return of 4.68%, while FANG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.61% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genuine Parts Company (GPC) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GPC Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPC and FANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than FANG's 4.57% yield.

The maximum GPC drawdown since its inception was -54.89%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPC and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Genuine Parts Company (GPC) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) have volatilities of 8.93% and 9.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genuine Parts Company and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.