PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPAFX vs. USBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPAFX vs. USBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund (GPAFX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPAFX achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than USBLX's 6.50% return. Over the past 10 years, GPAFX has outperformed USBLX with an annualized return of 11.31%, while USBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.


GPAFX

1D
-0.66%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
4.40%
6M
6.50%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
11.31%

USBLX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.81%
YTD
6.50%
6M
6.64%
1Y
17.70%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
8.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPAFX vs. USBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPAFX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund
4.40%15.80%20.95%13.27%-4.64%23.04%-1.05%30.73%-9.55%18.32%
USBLX
USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund
6.50%10.30%13.32%16.10%-15.82%14.80%10.78%18.46%-1.95%13.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GPAFX and USBLX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between GPAFX and USBLX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPAFX vs. USBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPAFX
GPAFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GPAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GPAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

USBLX
USBLX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
USBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
USBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
USBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
USBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPAFX vs. USBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund (GPAFX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPAFXUSBLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

2.89

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

4.16

-1.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.55

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.43

-1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.66

16.86

-8.20

GPAFX vs. USBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the USBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPAFX and USBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPAFXUSBLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.89

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.80

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.91

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.82

-0.36

Drawdowns

GPAFX vs. USBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPAFX drawdown since its inception was -62.16%, which is greater than USBLX's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPAFX and USBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPAFXUSBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.16%

-33.49%

-28.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-5.24%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.86%

-11.66%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.30%

-20.51%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.08%

-21.93%

-18.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

0.00%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.38%

-4.30%

-12.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

1.07%

+1.10%

Volatility

GPAFX vs. USBLX - Volatility Comparison

Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund (GPAFX) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX) at 1.77%. This indicates that GPAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPAFXUSBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

1.77%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

4.87%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

6.23%

+4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

8.65%

+7.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

9.09%

+8.53%

GPAFX vs. USBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPAFX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than USBLX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPAFX vs. USBLX - Dividend Comparison

GPAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.72%, more than USBLX's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPAFX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund
10.72%11.19%14.74%1.12%9.93%12.50%3.80%3.84%21.74%8.36%6.84%13.78%
USBLX
USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund
2.01%1.96%2.28%2.11%1.74%1.66%1.88%1.95%2.73%2.16%2.31%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPAFX and USBLX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPAFX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to USBLX (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPAFX dropped -62.16% vs USBLX's -33.49%.

USBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPAFX and USBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer