PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPAFX vs. RSNRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GPAFX vs. RSNRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund (GPAFX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPAFX achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly lower than RSNRX's 38.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GPAFX has underperformed RSNRX with an annualized return of 11.27%, while RSNRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.


GPAFX

1D
-0.49%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
3.94%
6M
4.86%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
11.27%

RSNRX

1D
-0.42%
1M
5.81%
YTD
38.18%
6M
40.35%
1Y
104.04%
3Y*
34.64%
5Y*
30.74%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GPAFX vs. RSNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GPAFX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund
3.94%15.80%20.95%13.27%-4.64%23.04%-1.05%30.73%-9.55%18.32%
RSNRX
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund
38.18%69.60%15.94%-8.64%35.02%83.01%27.35%-24.49%-45.81%1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between GPAFX and RSNRX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1996

0.55

The correlation between GPAFX and RSNRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GPAFX vs. RSNRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPAFX
GPAFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GPAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GPAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

RSNRX
RSNRX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RSNRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSNRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSNRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RSNRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSNRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPAFX vs. RSNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund (GPAFX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPAFXRSNRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.73

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

9.05

-6.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

30.61

-22.34

GPAFX vs. RSNRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the RSNRX Sharpe Ratio of 4.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPAFX and RSNRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPAFXRSNRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

4.66

-2.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

1.24

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.43

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.32

+0.14

Drawdowns

GPAFX vs. RSNRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPAFX drawdown since its inception was -62.16%, smaller than the maximum RSNRX drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPAFX and RSNRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GPAFXRSNRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.16%

-89.73%

+27.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-11.65%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.86%

-25.44%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.30%

-25.44%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.08%

-84.27%

+44.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-0.42%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.38%

-25.93%

+9.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

3.44%

-1.26%

Volatility

GPAFX vs. RSNRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund (GPAFX) is 2.59%, while Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that GPAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSNRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GPAFXRSNRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

5.36%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.63%

17.01%

-9.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

22.61%

-12.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

24.92%

-9.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

31.51%

-13.89%

GPAFX vs. RSNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPAFX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than RSNRX's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GPAFX vs. RSNRX - Dividend Comparison

GPAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.77%, more than RSNRX's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPAFX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund
10.77%11.19%14.74%1.12%9.93%12.50%3.80%3.84%21.74%8.36%6.84%13.78%
RSNRX
Victory Global Energy Transition Fund
3.17%4.38%1.65%2.36%0.78%0.00%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GPAFX and RSNRX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSNRX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to GPAFX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPAFX dropped -62.16% vs RSNRX's -89.73%.

RSNRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.66 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GPAFX and RSNRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer