GOU vs. MSFL
GOU (GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF) and MSFL (GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.
Performance
GOU vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOU achieves a 13.50% return, which is significantly higher than MSFL's -18.68% return.
GOU
- 1D
- 13.42%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MSFL
- 1D
- 5.79%
- 1M
- 37.76%
- 6M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- -18.68%
- 1Y
- -33.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.72M | $2.58M | $2.18M | |
| $37.77M | $32.36M | $34.28M |
GOU vs. MSFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOU GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF | 13.50% | -4.00% |
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF | -18.68% | -2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOU and MSFL is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOU vs. MSFL — Risk / Return Rank
GOU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSFL
GOU vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF (GOU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOU | MSFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.93 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOU vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOU drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, smaller than the maximum MSFL drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOU and MSFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOU | MSFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -62.08% | +21.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -62.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.96% | -36.63% | +10.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.59% | -23.68% | +9.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.31% | — |
Volatility
GOU vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOU | MSFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 29.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 51.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.73% | 63.24% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.73% | 54.34% | +10.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.73% | 54.34% | +10.39% |
GOU vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GOU and MSFL have an expense ratio of 1.15%.
Dividends
GOU vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison
Neither GOU nor MSFL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GOU and MSFL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOU and MSFL have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.
GOU and MSFL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for GOU and MSFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer