GOOY vs. QDTE
GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOOY returned 81.48% vs 35.38% for QDTE. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOOY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.
Performance
GOOY vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOY achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's 12.97% return.
GOOY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- 13.92%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 81.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 12.97%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- 1Y
- 35.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOY vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 13.92% | 53.95% | 25.57% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 12.97% | 19.32% | 17.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOY and QDTE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between GOOY and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOY vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
GOOY
QDTE
GOOY vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOOY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.38 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 3.33 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.64 | 12.94 | +5.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOOY vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOY drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOY and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -22.86% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.15% | -10.20% | -5.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.37% | -3.24% | -5.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -3.15% | -3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 2.62% | +1.76% |
Volatility
GOOY vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) is 6.21%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that GOOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 7.09% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.39% | 12.66% | +4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.33% | 15.99% | +7.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.29% | 18.77% | +4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.29% | 18.77% | +4.52% |
GOOY vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOOY vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
GOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.78%, more than QDTE's 44.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | 49.78% | 41.50% | 36.74% | 7.90% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 44.17% | 49.49% | 32.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOY and QDTE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDTE has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to GOOY (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOY dropped -24.40% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 81.48% vs 35.38% for QDTE. On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 81.48% return vs 35.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.
GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 49.78%, compared with 44.17% for QDTE.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOY and 0.97% for QDTE.
GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOY and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer