PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOY vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOY vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOY achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's 12.97% return.


GOOY

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.48%
YTD
13.92%
6M
14.56%
1Y
81.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
0.79%
1M
1.25%
YTD
12.97%
6M
13.97%
1Y
35.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOY vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOOY and QDTE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.59

The correlation between GOOY and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOY vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOY vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOYQDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.38

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

3.33

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.64

12.94

+5.70

GOOY vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOY Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is higher than the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOY and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOY vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOY drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOY and QDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOYQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.40%

-22.86%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.15%

-10.20%

-5.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.37%

-3.24%

-5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-3.15%

-3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

2.62%

+1.76%

Volatility

GOOY vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) is 6.21%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that GOOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOYQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

7.09%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.39%

12.66%

+4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.33%

15.99%

+7.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.29%

18.77%

+4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.29%

18.77%

+4.52%

GOOY vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOOY vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

GOOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.78%, more than QDTE's 44.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
49.78%41.50%36.74%7.90%
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
44.17%49.49%32.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOY and QDTE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDTE has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to GOOY (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOY dropped -24.40% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 81.48% vs 35.38% for QDTE. On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 81.48% return vs 35.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 49.78%, compared with 44.17% for QDTE.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOY and 0.97% for QDTE.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOY and QDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer