PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOW vs. GPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOW vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOW achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 10.39% return.


GOOW

1D
-5.42%
1M
-6.62%
6M
5.16%
YTD
12.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPIX

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.57%
6M
8.97%
YTD
10.39%
1Y
20.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOW vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOOW and GPIX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.59

GOOW vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GOOW
GPIX

Communication Services

100.0%
10.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Energy

-

3.2%

Financial Services

-

10.9%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

7.7%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

39.2%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Communication Services

GOOW
100.0%
GPIX
10.7%

Basic Materials

GOOW

-

GPIX
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GOOW

-

GPIX
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

GOOW

-

GPIX
4.4%

Energy

GOOW

-

GPIX
3.2%

Financial Services

GOOW

-

GPIX
10.9%

Healthcare

GOOW

-

GPIX
8.3%

Industrials

GOOW

-

GPIX
7.7%

Real Estate

GOOW

-

GPIX
1.8%

Technology

GOOW

-

GPIX
39.2%

Utilities

GOOW

-

GPIX
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOW vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOW vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOWGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

GOOW vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOW vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -24.88%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and GPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOWGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.88%

-17.50%

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.12%

-0.43%

-14.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-1.47%

-4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

Volatility

GOOW vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOWGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.08%

10.89%

+27.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.08%

13.78%

+24.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.08%

13.78%

+24.30%

GOOW vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOOW vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.35%, more than GPIX's 8.09% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOW
Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF
41.35%19.77%0.00%0.00%
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.09%8.01%7.45%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOW and GPIX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOW.

GOOW has the higher dividend yield at 41.35%, compared with 8.09% for GPIX.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOW and 0.29% for GPIX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOW and GPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer