GOOW vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GOOW (Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GOOW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. GOOW is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. GOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

GOOW vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOW achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.

GOOW

• 1D: 4.51%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: 20.63%
• 6M: 17.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBO

• 1D: -2.66%
• 1M: -3.39%
• YTD: 79.84%
• 6M: 74.51%
• 1Y: 77.38%
• 3Y*: 20.83%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: 10.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOW vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	20.63%	75.51%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	79.84%	-8.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOW and DBO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	-0.16

GOOW vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GOOW	DBO
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	116.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GOOW vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOW vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOOW	DBO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.71	0.02	+3.69

Drawdowns

GOOW vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOW drawdown since its inception was -24.88%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOW and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOOW	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.88%	-90.18%	+65.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.28%	-52.68%	+43.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-62.25%	+57.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GOOW	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.56%	34.58%	+2.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.56%	32.31%	+5.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.56%	31.79%	+5.77%

GOOW vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOOW vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

GOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.69%, more than DBO's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.95%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	33.69%	19.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOOW and DBO in my portfolio?

GOOW and DBO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GOOW or DBO?

On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GOOW or DBO?

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GOOW or DBO?

GOOW has the higher dividend yield at 33.69%, compared with 1.95% for DBO.

What is the main difference between GOOW and DBO?

GOOW is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOW and 0.78% for DBO.