PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOP vs. MSFY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOP vs. MSFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOP achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly higher than MSFY's -13.99% return.


GOOP

1D
-0.95%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
12.36%
6M
10.67%
1Y
93.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFY

1D
-3.43%
1M
4.37%
YTD
-13.99%
6M
-12.67%
1Y
-7.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOP vs. MSFY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
12.36%52.46%27.67%6.17%
MSFY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
-13.99%14.11%10.88%2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOP and MSFY is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between GOOP and MSFY has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOP vs. MSFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFY
MSFY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOP vs. MSFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOOPMSFYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.34

-0.27

+3.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.35

-0.19

+4.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

0.97

+0.60

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

-0.21

+4.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.39

-0.47

+15.86

GOOP vs. MSFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOP Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the MSFY Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOP and MSFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOOPMSFYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34

-0.27

+3.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.20

+1.31

Drawdowns

GOOP vs. MSFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOP drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, smaller than the maximum MSFY drawdown of -34.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOP and MSFY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOPMSFYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-34.21%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.32%

-34.21%

+10.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.90%

-20.53%

+8.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-7.20%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

15.40%

-9.28%

Volatility

GOOP vs. MSFY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) is 9.14%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that GOOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOPMSFYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

10.84%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.59%

25.02%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.30%

26.51%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

22.27%

+3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.91%

22.27%

+3.64%

GOOP vs. MSFY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFY's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOOP vs. MSFY - Dividend Comparison

GOOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.25%, less than MSFY's 24.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
12.25%11.79%13.73%2.06%
MSFY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
24.31%18.56%14.35%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOOP and MSFY have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFY has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to GOOP (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOP dropped -27.49% vs MSFY's -34.21%.

On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 93.82% vs -7.25% for MSFY. On fees, GOOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GOOP has been the lower-risk option at 9.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 93.82% return vs -7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for MSFY.

MSFY has the higher dividend yield at 24.31%, compared with 12.25% for GOOP.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GOOP and 1.00% for MSFY.

GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOP and MSFY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer