PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOGL vs. BMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOOGL vs. BMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOGL achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly higher than BMI's -22.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GOOGL has outperformed BMI with an annualized return of 26.61%, while BMI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.34% annualized return.


GOOGL

1D
2.69%
1M
-6.86%
YTD
18.16%
6M
19.99%
1Y
112.06%
3Y*
44.49%
5Y*
25.27%
10Y*
26.61%

BMI

1D
2.03%
1M
18.05%
YTD
-22.48%
6M
-26.34%
1Y
-44.05%
3Y*
-2.73%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
15.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOGL vs. BMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
18.16%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%65.30%30.85%28.18%-0.80%32.93%
BMI
Badger Meter, Inc.
-22.48%-17.15%38.28%42.58%3.23%14.11%46.37%33.46%4.09%30.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GOOGL and BMI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2004

0.34

The correlation between GOOGL and BMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOOGL:

$4.52T

BMI:

$3.95B

EPS

GOOGL:

$13.11

BMI:

$4.42

PE Ratio

GOOGL:

28.16

BMI:

30.38

PEG Ratio

GOOGL:

1.39

BMI:

1.27

PS Ratio

GOOGL:

10.68

BMI:

4.42

PB Ratio

GOOGL:

9.44

BMI:

4.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOOGL:

$422.57B

BMI:

$896.73M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOOGL:

$255.12B

BMI:

$370.96M

EBITDA (TTM)

GOOGL:

$174.08B

BMI:

$199.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOGL vs. BMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BMI
BMI Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
BMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOGL vs. BMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) and Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOGLBMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

0.80

+0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.53

-0.82

+6.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.59

-1.33

+20.92

GOOGL vs. BMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOGL Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the BMI Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOGL and BMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOGL vs. BMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOGL drawdown since its inception was -65.29%, roughly equal to the maximum BMI drawdown of -68.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOGL and BMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOGLBMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.29%

-68.22%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.37%

-53.79%

+33.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.81%

-55.06%

+25.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.32%

-55.06%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-55.06%

+10.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-46.57%

+38.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-19.03%

+6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

33.17%

-27.43%

Volatility

GOOGL vs. BMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) is 7.91%, while Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) has a volatility of 9.60%. This indicates that GOOGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOGLBMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

9.60%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.82%

38.63%

-17.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.42%

44.31%

-14.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.36%

33.91%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.15%

33.69%

-4.54%

Dividends

GOOGL vs. BMI - Dividend Comparison

GOOGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than BMI's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMI
Badger Meter, Inc.
1.19%0.85%0.58%0.64%0.78%0.71%0.74%0.99%1.14%1.03%1.16%1.33%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.23%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GOOGL vs. BMI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc. Class A and Badger Meter, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
109.90B
202.28M
(GOOGL) Total Revenue
(BMI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GOOGL vs. BMI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alphabet Inc. Class A and Badger Meter, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
62.5%
41.7%
Portfolio components
GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

BMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a gross profit of 84.33M and revenue of 202.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.7%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

BMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.17M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.

BMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a net income of 27.34M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOOGL and BMI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMI has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to GOOGL (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOGL dropped -65.29% vs BMI's -68.22%.

GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOGL and BMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer