PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLY vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLY vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Shares Gold Enhanced Yield ETF (GOLY) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLY achieves a -26.54% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return.


GOLY

1D
-0.68%
1M
-2.80%
6M
-24.07%
YTD
-26.54%
1Y
-9.02%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.18%

BNO

1D
1.45%
1M
27.00%
6M
52.90%
YTD
77.90%
1Y
62.83%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
15.06%
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.13M$97.34M$147.52M
$645.25K$545.45K$1.00M

GOLY vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GOLY
Strategy Shares Gold Enhanced Yield ETF
-26.54%57.98%19.82%12.74%-19.96%-1.40%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.90%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%18.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLY and BNO is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2021

0.02

The correlation between GOLY and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.03 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLY vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOLY
GOLY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GOLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOLY vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Gold Enhanced Yield ETF (GOLY) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLYBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.24

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

1.70

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

5.15

-5.45

GOLY vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLY Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLY and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLY vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLY drawdown since its inception was -37.99%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLY and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLYBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.99%

-87.06%

+49.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.99%

-34.46%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.99%

-34.46%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.99%

-34.46%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.62%

-16.21%

-20.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.56%

-39.99%

+27.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.14%

11.86%

+7.28%

Volatility

GOLY vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategy Shares Gold Enhanced Yield ETF (GOLY) is 6.91%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that GOLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLYBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

17.47%

-10.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.03%

40.96%

-10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.02%

44.54%

-10.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.76%

36.41%

-13.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

36.98%

-14.55%

GOLY vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOLY vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

GOLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.40%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOLY
Strategy Shares Gold Enhanced Yield ETF
9.40%7.22%3.85%2.94%2.57%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLY and BNO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to GOLY (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLY dropped -37.99% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 5-year performance, BNO leads with 20.89% vs 4.37% for GOLY. On fees, GOLY is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, GOLY has been the lower-risk option at 6.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BNO has performed better with a 20.89% return vs 4.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOLY is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

GOLY has the higher dividend yield at 9.40%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

GOLY is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Strategy Shares and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for GOLY and 1.00% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLY and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer