PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLY vs. ICVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLY vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GOLY) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLY achieves a -23.60% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's 26.89% return.


GOLY

1D
-1.22%
1M
-6.92%
YTD
-23.60%
6M
-25.65%
1Y
-6.67%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
5.95%
10Y*

ICVT

1D
0.02%
1M
5.09%
YTD
26.89%
6M
24.71%
1Y
43.39%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
14.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLY vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GOLY
Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF
-23.60%57.98%19.82%12.74%-19.96%-1.40%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
26.89%18.10%10.61%15.35%-20.66%0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLY and ICVT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2021

0.20

The correlation between GOLY and ICVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLY vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLY
GOLY Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GOLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ICVT
ICVT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ICVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ICVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLY vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GOLY) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLYICVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.50

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

5.78

-5.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

19.71

-20.16

GOLY vs. ICVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLY Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the ICVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLY and ICVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLY vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLY drawdown since its inception was -36.08%, which is greater than ICVT's maximum drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLY and ICVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLYICVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.08%

-33.25%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.08%

-7.55%

-28.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.08%

-11.22%

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.08%

-29.95%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.08%

0.00%

-34.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

-9.46%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.83%

2.21%

+12.62%

Volatility

GOLY vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison

Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GOLY) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) at 6.96%. This indicates that GOLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLYICVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

6.96%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.54%

12.95%

+17.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.81%

15.57%

+18.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

13.49%

+9.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

15.61%

+6.80%

GOLY vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ICVT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOLY vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison

GOLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than ICVT's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOLY
Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF
9.64%7.22%3.85%2.94%2.57%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
1.28%1.73%2.19%1.85%1.93%7.70%3.98%1.86%4.82%2.56%3.06%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLY and ICVT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOLY has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to ICVT (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLY dropped -36.08% vs ICVT's -33.25%.

On 5-year performance, ICVT leads with 7.36% vs 5.95% for GOLY. On fees, ICVT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ICVT has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ICVT has performed better with a 7.36% return vs 5.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICVT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GOLY.

GOLY has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 1.28% for ICVT.

GOLY is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while ICVT is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. GOLY tracks Solactive Gold-Backed Bond Index, while ICVT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Convertible Cash Pay Bond > $250MM Index. They also come from different issuers: Strategy Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for GOLY and 0.20% for ICVT.

ICVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLY and ICVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer