PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLF vs. CMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GOLF vs. CMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLF achieves a 23.65% return, which is significantly higher than CMG's -12.89% return.


GOLF

1D
-1.29%
1M
14.41%
YTD
23.65%
6M
16.38%
1Y
42.41%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
15.83%
10Y*

CMG

1D
3.14%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-12.89%
6M
-10.82%
1Y
-35.85%
3Y*
-7.94%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLF vs. CMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
23.65%14.09%13.96%51.02%-18.69%32.71%27.13%57.63%2.09%9.84%
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
-12.89%-38.64%31.83%64.83%-20.64%26.07%65.65%93.87%49.39%-23.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLF and CMG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2016

0.29

The correlation between GOLF and CMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOLF:

$5.89B

CMG:

$41.96B

EPS

GOLF:

$2.83

CMG:

$1.09

PE Ratio

GOLF:

34.73

CMG:

29.48

PEG Ratio

GOLF:

4.83

CMG:

1.10

PS Ratio

GOLF:

2.27

CMG:

3.53

PB Ratio

GOLF:

7.14

CMG:

17.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOLF:

$2.61B

CMG:

$12.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOLF:

$1.24B

CMG:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOLF:

$321.92M

CMG:

$2.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLF vs. CMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLF
GOLF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GOLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLF Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CMG
CMG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLF vs. CMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLFCMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.83

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

-0.71

+2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

-1.04

+6.47

GOLF vs. CMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the CMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLF and CMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLF vs. CMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLF drawdown since its inception was -35.46%, smaller than the maximum CMG drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLF and CMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLFCMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.46%

-74.61%

+39.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-51.61%

+33.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.49%

-58.89%

+33.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.37%

-58.89%

+25.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.44%

-52.98%

+48.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-21.37%

+11.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.06%

35.40%

-28.34%

Volatility

GOLF vs. CMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) is 7.56%, while Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that GOLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLFCMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

10.80%

-3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.00%

23.87%

-2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.03%

38.63%

-10.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.28%

33.60%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.44%

35.63%

-4.19%

Dividends

GOLF vs. CMG - Dividend Comparison

GOLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOLF
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
1.25%1.49%1.21%1.23%1.70%1.24%1.53%1.72%2.47%2.28%

Financials

GOLF vs. CMG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acushnet Holdings Corp. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
752.98M
3.09B
(GOLF) Total Revenue
(CMG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GOLF vs. CMG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Acushnet Holdings Corp. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
47.2%
68.4%
Portfolio components
GOLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 355.26M and revenue of 752.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.2%.

CMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.11B and revenue of 3.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.

GOLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 120.15M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

CMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported an operating income of 397.06M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

GOLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 81.42M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

CMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a net income of 302.82M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GOLF and CMG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMG has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to GOLF (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOLF dropped -35.46% vs CMG's -74.61%.

GOLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLF and CMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer