PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GOLD vs. FLOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GOLD vs. FLOT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GOLD (Barrick Mining Corporation) is a stock, while FLOT (iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GOLD vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLD achieves a 23.83% return, which is significantly higher than FLOT's 2.03% return.

GOLD

1D
-1.04%
1M
-3.66%
YTD
23.83%
6M
25.01%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

FLOT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.33%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.19%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
3.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLD vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
GOLD
Barrick Mining Corporation		23.83%13.01%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF		2.03%0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLD and FLOT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Barrick Mining Corporation

iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF

Often compared with GOLD:
GOLD vs. GLDGOLD vs. GDXGOLD vs. SPYGOLD vs. NEMGOLD vs. ^DXYGOLD vs. GDXJGOLD vs. AEM
Often compared with FLOT:
FLOT vs. SGOVFLOT vs. USFRFLOT vs. FLTRFLOT vs. FLRNFLOT vs. FLOA.LFLOT vs. NEARFLOT vs. IUSB

Return for Risk

GOLD vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GOLD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLD vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

GOLDFLOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

6.42

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

11.58

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

3.15

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

11.13

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

103.02

—

GOLD vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLD vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLD drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD and FLOT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GOLDFLOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.58%

-13.54%

-27.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-0.43%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-1.57%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-2.36%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-13.54%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.26%

0.00%

-34.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.57%

-0.21%

-18.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

0.05%

—

Volatility

GOLD vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GOLDFLOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

0.21%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

0.63%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.69%

0.75%

+56.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.69%

1.78%

+55.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.69%

4.15%

+53.54%

Dividends

GOLD vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

GOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than FLOT's 4.53% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF		4.53%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
GOLD
Barrick Mining Corporation		0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

GOLD and FLOT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLD and FLOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer