GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU
GOLD.TO (GoldMining Inc.) is a stock, while ^XAU (Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, GOLD.TO returned 20.60%/yr vs 16.12%/yr for ^XAU. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GOLD.TO is traded in CAD, while ^XAU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^XAU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLD.TO achieves a -9.30% return, which is significantly lower than ^XAU's 9.25% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLD.TO has outperformed ^XAU with an annualized return of 20.60%, while ^XAU has yielded a comparatively lower 16.12% annualized return.
GOLD.TO
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -9.30%
- 6M
- -20.81%
- 1Y
- 45.79%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 27.00%
- 10Y*
- 20.60%
^XAU
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 84.05%
- 3Y*
- 45.02%
- 5Y*
- 21.52%
- 10Y*
- 16.12%
GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLD.TO GoldMining Inc. | -9.30% | 49.57% | 26.55% | 17.53% | 59.76% | -12.88% | 140.75% | 93.82% | -41.35% | -34.16% |
^XAU Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index | 9.25% | 138.07% | 18.52% | 1.71% | -2.25% | -8.97% | 32.58% | 43.88% | -10.11% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLD.TO and ^XAU is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2011 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, GOLD.TO and ^XAU have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU — Risk / Return Rank
GOLD.TO
^XAU
GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) and Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index (^XAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOLD.TO | ^XAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.95 | -1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 2.26 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.32 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 2.81 | -1.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 7.46 | -5.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOLD.TO | ^XAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.95 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.65 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.47 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.22 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.83%, roughly equal to the maximum ^XAU drawdown of -75.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD.TO and ^XAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLD.TO | ^XAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.83% | -75.39% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.00% | -29.81% | -20.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.00% | -29.81% | -20.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.00% | -41.09% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.83% | -45.32% | -31.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.58% | -20.03% | -26.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.75% | -34.08% | -2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.36% | 11.21% | +14.15% |
Volatility
GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) is 13.44%, while Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index (^XAU) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that GOLD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^XAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLD.TO | ^XAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.44% | 14.45% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.20% | 35.09% | +13.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.55% | 43.46% | +20.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.20% | 33.52% | +21.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.67% | 34.16% | +23.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLD.TO and ^XAU have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GOLD.TO and ^XAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer