PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) and PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GOLD.TO is traded in CAD, while ^XAU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^XAU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLD.TO achieves a -26.74% return, which is significantly lower than ^XAU's -1.29% return.


GOLD.TO

1D
-3.82%
1M
-17.65%
YTD
-26.74%
6M
-32.98%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
2.79%
5Y*
-7.29%
10Y*

^XAU

1D
-4.77%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
-5.56%
1Y
65.37%
3Y*
43.82%
5Y*
21.30%
10Y*
14.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GOLD.TO
GoldMining Inc.
-26.74%49.57%-11.54%-15.58%0.65%-44.77%108.27%70.51%-22.00%
^XAU
PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index
-1.29%138.12%18.38%1.52%-2.97%-8.19%31.66%45.08%-11.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLD.TO and ^XAU is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2018

0.56

The correlation between GOLD.TO and ^XAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLD.TO
GOLD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GOLD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

^XAU
^XAU Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
^XAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XAU Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
^XAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XAU Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) and PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOLD.TO^XAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.24

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

1.92

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

4.84

-4.14

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the ^XAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLD.TO and ^XAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, roughly equal to the maximum ^XAU drawdown of -75.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD.TO and ^XAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLD.TO^XAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.14%

-75.37%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.56%

-32.46%

-26.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.56%

-32.46%

-26.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.32%

-41.39%

-18.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.75%

-28.07%

-38.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.28%

-29.63%

-16.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.53%

12.87%

+15.66%

Volatility

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Volatility Comparison

GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.74% compared to PHLX Gold/Silver Sector Index (^XAU) at 16.76%. This indicates that GOLD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^XAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLD.TO^XAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.74%

16.76%

+4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.24%

38.88%

+12.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.51%

46.67%

+19.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.91%

36.98%

+14.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.06%

37.00%

+18.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLD.TO and ^XAU have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLD.TO and ^XAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer