PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) and Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index (^XAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GOLD.TO is traded in CAD, while ^XAU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^XAU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLD.TO achieves a -12.79% return, which is significantly lower than ^XAU's 5.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLD.TO has outperformed ^XAU with an annualized return of 20.13%, while ^XAU has yielded a comparatively lower 15.76% annualized return.


GOLD.TO

1D
-3.85%
1M
-6.25%
YTD
-12.79%
6M
-25.00%
1Y
40.19%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
26.13%
10Y*
20.13%

^XAU

1D
-3.01%
1M
4.97%
YTD
5.96%
6M
12.18%
1Y
78.51%
3Y*
43.55%
5Y*
20.53%
10Y*
15.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOLD.TO
GoldMining Inc.
-12.79%49.57%26.55%17.53%59.76%-12.88%140.75%93.82%-41.35%-34.16%
^XAU
Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index
5.96%138.07%18.52%1.71%-2.25%-8.97%32.58%43.88%-10.11%1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GOLD.TO and ^XAU is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2011

0.39

Over the past year, GOLD.TO and ^XAU have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLD.TO
GOLD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GOLD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOLD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOLD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GOLD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOLD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

^XAU
^XAU Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
^XAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XAU Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
^XAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XAU Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) and Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index (^XAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOLD.TO^XAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.82

-1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

2.16

-0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.30

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

2.65

-1.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.58

6.97

-5.39

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the ^XAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLD.TO and ^XAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOLD.TO^XAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.82

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.62

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.46

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.21

+0.05

Drawdowns

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.83%, roughly equal to the maximum ^XAU drawdown of -75.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD.TO and ^XAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLD.TO^XAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.83%

-75.39%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.00%

-29.81%

-20.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.00%

-29.81%

-20.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.00%

-41.09%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.83%

-45.32%

-31.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.63%

-22.44%

-26.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.75%

-34.08%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.54%

11.30%

+14.24%

Volatility

GOLD.TO vs. ^XAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) is 13.89%, while Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index (^XAU) has a volatility of 14.93%. This indicates that GOLD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^XAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLD.TO^XAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.89%

14.93%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.34%

35.30%

+13.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.58%

43.26%

+20.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.19%

33.54%

+21.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.68%

34.17%

+23.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLD.TO and ^XAU have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLD.TO and ^XAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer