PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GOLD.TO vs. NG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GOLD.TONG
YTD Return-2.31%-7.75%
1Y Return16.51%-9.92%
3Y Return (Ann)-8.78%-22.65%
5Y Return (Ann)4.30%-12.62%
10Y Return (Ann)7.15%3.20%
Sharpe Ratio0.48-0.01
Sortino Ratio0.970.40
Omega Ratio1.111.05
Calmar Ratio0.24-0.01
Martin Ratio1.20-0.02
Ulcer Index14.68%24.12%
Daily Std Dev36.95%59.37%
Max Drawdown-76.83%-97.85%
Current Drawdown-66.49%-83.52%

Fundamentals


GOLD.TONG
Market CapCA$242.50M$1.16B
EPS-CA$0.13-$0.14
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$0.00$10.00K
Gross Profit (TTM)-CA$333.00K-$11.94K
EBITDA (TTM)-CA$19.64M-$26.85M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between GOLD.TO and NG is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GOLD.TO vs. NG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GOLD.TO achieves a -2.31% return, which is significantly higher than NG's -7.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLD.TO has outperformed NG with an annualized return of 7.15%, while NG has yielded a comparatively lower 3.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-15.46%
-66.41%
GOLD.TO
NG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GOLD.TO vs. NG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) and NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GOLD.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.13
NG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NG, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NG, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.31
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NG, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NG, currently valued at -0.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NG, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.17

GOLD.TO vs. NG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOLD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the NG Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLD.TO and NG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.45
-0.07
GOLD.TO
NG

Dividends

GOLD.TO vs. NG - Dividend Comparison

Neither GOLD.TO nor NG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GOLD.TO vs. NG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLD.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.83%, smaller than the maximum NG drawdown of -97.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD.TO and NG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-68.63%
-71.58%
GOLD.TO
NG

Volatility

GOLD.TO vs. NG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) is 8.45%, while NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG) has a volatility of 13.11%. This indicates that GOLD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.45%
13.11%
GOLD.TO
NG

Financials

GOLD.TO vs. NG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GoldMining Inc. and NovaGold Resources Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. GOLD.TO values in CAD, NG values in USD