PortfoliosLab logo
^XAU vs. EPGFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^XAU and EPGFX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

^XAU vs. EPGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index (^XAU) and EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
96.17%
85.91%
^XAU
EPGFX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^XAU:

1.17

EPGFX:

1.23

Sortino Ratio

^XAU:

1.69

EPGFX:

1.77

Omega Ratio

^XAU:

1.22

EPGFX:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

^XAU:

0.96

EPGFX:

1.19

Martin Ratio

^XAU:

4.20

EPGFX:

4.18

Ulcer Index

^XAU:

9.52%

EPGFX:

8.85%

Daily Std Dev

^XAU:

34.15%

EPGFX:

30.03%

Max Drawdown

^XAU:

-83.04%

EPGFX:

-57.97%

Current Drawdown

^XAU:

-18.76%

EPGFX:

-4.79%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ^XAU having a 35.59% return and EPGFX slightly lower at 34.27%. Over the past 10 years, ^XAU has outperformed EPGFX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while EPGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.11% annualized return.


^XAU

YTD

35.59%

1M

6.14%

6M

11.86%

1Y

35.55%

5Y*

9.64%

10Y*

9.67%

EPGFX

YTD

34.27%

1M

7.19%

6M

10.98%

1Y

34.83%

5Y*

7.37%

10Y*

9.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^XAU vs. EPGFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XAU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^XAU is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^XAU is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^XAU is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^XAU is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^XAU is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^XAU is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EPGFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EPGFX is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EPGFX is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EPGFX is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EPGFX is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EPGFX is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EPGFX is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^XAU vs. EPGFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index (^XAU) and EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^XAU, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.50
^XAU: 1.17
EPGFX: 1.23
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^XAU, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00
^XAU: 1.69
EPGFX: 1.77
The chart of Omega ratio for ^XAU, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.901.001.101.201.30
^XAU: 1.22
EPGFX: 1.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^XAU, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.00
^XAU: 1.78
EPGFX: 1.19
The chart of Martin ratio for ^XAU, currently valued at 4.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00
^XAU: 4.20
EPGFX: 4.18

The current ^XAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the EPGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XAU and EPGFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.17
1.23
^XAU
EPGFX

Drawdowns

^XAU vs. EPGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XAU drawdown since its inception was -83.04%, which is greater than EPGFX's maximum drawdown of -57.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XAU and EPGFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-4.77%
-4.79%
^XAU
EPGFX

Volatility

^XAU vs. EPGFX - Volatility Comparison

Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index (^XAU) has a higher volatility of 16.49% compared to EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) at 13.62%. This indicates that ^XAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.49%
13.62%
^XAU
EPGFX