PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOBSX vs. LMLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOBSX vs. LMLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) and Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOBSX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than LMLCX's -0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GOBSX has underperformed LMLCX with an annualized return of 1.00%, while LMLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.17% annualized return.


GOBSX

1D
0.68%
1M
0.91%
6M
0.31%
YTD
2.45%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
2.55%
5Y*
-1.49%
10Y*
1.00%
ALL TIME*
3.50%

LMLCX

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.29%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
4.17%
ALL TIME*
4.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GOBSX vs. LMLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOBSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund
2.45%13.59%-9.38%7.42%-15.66%-5.27%12.66%9.21%-5.59%11.51%
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
-0.54%12.22%-2.21%12.93%-3.51%3.08%2.93%15.10%-4.24%7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GOBSX and LMLCX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2012

0.52

The correlation between GOBSX and LMLCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOBSX vs. LMLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOBSX
GOBSX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GOBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GOBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

LMLCX
LMLCX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
LMLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
LMLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOBSX vs. LMLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) and Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOBSXLMLCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.15

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

1.26

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

4.02

-1.23

GOBSX vs. LMLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOBSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the LMLCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOBSX and LMLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOBSX vs. LMLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOBSX drawdown since its inception was -29.04%, which is greater than LMLCX's maximum drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOBSX and LMLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOBSXLMLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.04%

-23.45%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.10%

-4.22%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.88%

-11.77%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-11.77%

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.04%

-23.45%

-5.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.86%

-2.94%

-6.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.74%

-1.93%

-4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.32%

+0.59%

Volatility

GOBSX vs. LMLCX - Volatility Comparison

BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) and Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund (LMLCX) have volatilities of 1.44% and 1.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOBSXLMLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.49%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.57%

4.78%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.89%

6.40%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.30%

7.85%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.45%

7.22%

+1.23%

GOBSX vs. LMLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOBSX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than LMLCX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOBSX vs. LMLCX - Dividend Comparison

GOBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than LMLCX's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOBSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund
5.18%4.28%3.80%0.09%6.70%2.30%0.31%1.56%3.15%3.68%1.87%2.61%
LMLCX
Western Asset SMASh Series C Fund
6.39%6.11%6.58%5.78%4.46%5.42%3.54%4.16%5.59%4.04%3.75%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOBSX and LMLCX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMLCX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to GOBSX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOBSX dropped -29.04% vs LMLCX's -23.45%.

LMLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOBSX and LMLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer