PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOBSX vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOBSX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOBSX achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, GOBSX has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 1.14%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 10.21% annualized return.


GOBSX

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.24%
YTD
1.75%
6M
2.55%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
-1.67%
10Y*
1.14%

QYLD

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.44%
YTD
10.06%
6M
10.12%
1Y
25.81%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
8.73%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOBSX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GOBSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund
1.75%13.59%-9.38%7.42%-15.66%-5.27%12.66%9.21%-5.59%11.51%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
10.06%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GOBSX and QYLD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.22

The correlation between GOBSX and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOBSX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOBSX
GOBSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
GOBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
GOBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOBSX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOBSXQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.61

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

5.22

-4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.14

29.38

-27.24

GOBSX vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOBSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOBSX and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOBSX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOBSX drawdown since its inception was -29.04%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOBSX and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOBSXQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.04%

-24.75%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.10%

-4.97%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.81%

-19.06%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

-24.61%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.04%

-24.75%

-4.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.47%

-0.13%

-10.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-3.82%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

0.88%

+1.07%

Volatility

GOBSX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) is 1.76%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that GOBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOBSXQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

4.26%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.56%

8.24%

-2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.02%

9.50%

-2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.30%

14.81%

-5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.50%

15.55%

-7.05%

GOBSX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOBSX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOBSX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

GOBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than QYLD's 12.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOBSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund
4.05%4.28%3.80%0.09%6.70%2.30%0.31%1.56%3.15%3.68%1.87%2.61%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
12.36%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOBSX and QYLD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QYLD has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to GOBSX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOBSX dropped -29.04% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOBSX and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer