GOBSX vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
GOBSX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Oct 31, 2006. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
GOBSX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GOBSX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOBSX BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund | -2.91% | 13.59% | -9.38% | 7.42% | -15.66% | -5.27% | 12.66% | 9.21% | -5.59% | 11.51% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 0.61% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOBSX achieves a -2.91% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GOBSX has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 0.73%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
GOBSX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- -2.91%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 1.14%
- 5Y*
- -2.29%
- 10Y*
- 0.73%
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GOBSX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOBSX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GOBSX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
GOBSX
QYLD
GOBSX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOBSX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.00 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 1.61 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.31 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.57 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.09 | 10.32 | -7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOBSX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.00 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | 0.47 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.58 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.56 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between GOBSX and QYLD is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GOBSX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
GOBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than QYLD's 11.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOBSX BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund | 2.79% | 4.28% | 3.80% | 0.09% | 6.70% | 2.30% | 0.31% | 1.56% | 3.15% | 3.68% | 1.87% | 2.61% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.85% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Drawdowns
GOBSX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOBSX drawdown since its inception was -29.04%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOBSX and QYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOBSX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.04% | -24.75% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -10.84% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.04% | -24.61% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.04% | -24.75% | -4.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.57% | -1.84% | -12.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -3.89% | -2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.65% | +0.06% |
Volatility
GOBSX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Opportunities Bond Fund (GOBSX) is 3.00%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that GOBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GOBSX | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 4.90% | -1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.47% | 7.50% | -3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.28% | 16.43% | -9.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 14.84% | -5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.49% | 15.51% | -7.02% |