PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNT vs. PBJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNT vs. PBJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT) and Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNT achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than PBJ's 5.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GNT has outperformed PBJ with an annualized return of 9.51%, while PBJ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.


GNT

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.60%
YTD
15.43%
6M
8.44%
1Y
38.58%
3Y*
27.73%
5Y*
16.06%
10Y*
9.51%

PBJ

1D
1.57%
1M
-2.97%
YTD
5.32%
6M
4.88%
1Y
-0.24%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
5.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNT vs. PBJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GNT
GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust
15.43%52.39%10.47%7.79%2.84%12.01%-5.47%33.76%-18.54%9.73%
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
5.32%-1.86%2.49%2.31%3.14%26.88%5.53%17.50%-11.21%1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GNT and PBJ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNT vs. PBJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNT
GNT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PBJ
PBJ Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PBJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBJ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PBJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBJ Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNT vs. PBJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT) and Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GNTPBJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.01

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

-0.02

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

-0.04

+7.83

GNT vs. PBJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNT Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the PBJ Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNT and PBJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GNT vs. PBJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNT drawdown since its inception was -68.55%, which is greater than PBJ's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNT and PBJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNTPBJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.55%

-39.15%

-29.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.74%

-12.48%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.74%

-12.99%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.74%

-15.81%

-10.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.63%

-28.49%

-30.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.54%

-7.42%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.50%

-5.39%

-20.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.98%

5.41%

-0.43%

Volatility

GNT vs. PBJ - Volatility Comparison

GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) at 4.33%. This indicates that GNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNTPBJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

4.33%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.33%

9.40%

+9.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.34%

12.74%

+10.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.83%

13.77%

+6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.65%

15.13%

+9.52%

Dividends

GNT vs. PBJ - Dividend Comparison

GNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%, more than PBJ's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GNT
GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust
7.65%6.85%7.37%7.00%7.03%6.73%9.39%10.07%12.12%8.94%12.59%14.66%
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
1.30%1.83%1.11%1.81%1.82%0.90%1.12%1.21%1.41%0.70%1.56%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


GNT and PBJ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GNT has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to PBJ (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNT dropped -68.55% vs PBJ's -39.15%.

GNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNT and PBJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer