GNT vs. BCSF
GNT (GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust) and BCSF (Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, GNT returned 16.06%/yr vs 6.44%/yr for BCSF. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GNT vs. BCSF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNT achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than BCSF's -6.61% return.
GNT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 38.58%
- 3Y*
- 27.73%
- 5Y*
- 16.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
BCSF
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -6.61%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- 1Y
- -5.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.44%
- 10Y*
- —
GNT vs. BCSF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNT GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust | 15.43% | 52.39% | 10.47% | 7.79% | 2.84% | 12.01% | -5.47% | 33.76% | -7.12% |
BCSF Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. | -6.61% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 41.95% | -13.31% | 36.98% | -28.91% | 28.19% | -4.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNT and BCSF is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018 | 0.23 |
The correlation between GNT and BCSF shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GNT:
$133.37M
BCSF:
$787.50M
GNT:
$3.22
BCSF:
$1.50
GNT:
2.56
BCSF:
8.07
GNT:
5.39
BCSF:
3.32
GNT:
0.99
BCSF:
0.72
GNT:
$24.73M
BCSF:
$237.34M
GNT:
$18.29M
BCSF:
$150.81M
GNT:
$52.09M
BCSF:
-$29.62M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GNT vs. BCSF — Risk / Return Rank
GNT
BCSF
GNT vs. BCSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT) and Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GNT | BCSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.98 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | -0.32 | +2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | -0.64 | +8.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GNT vs. BCSF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNT drawdown since its inception was -68.55%, which is greater than BCSF's maximum drawdown of -62.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNT and BCSF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNT | BCSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.55% | -62.42% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.74% | -16.17% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.74% | -26.38% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.74% | -26.38% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.54% | -22.43% | +13.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.50% | -12.32% | -13.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 8.04% | -3.06% |
Volatility
GNT vs. BCSF - Volatility Comparison
GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust (GNT) and Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. (BCSF) have volatilities of 7.33% and 7.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GNT | BCSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 7.25% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.33% | 17.98% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.34% | 21.89% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 20.36% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 30.97% | -6.32% |
Dividends
GNT vs. BCSF - Dividend Comparison
GNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%, less than BCSF's 15.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCSF Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc. | 15.57% | 14.02% | 10.27% | 10.62% | 11.60% | 8.94% | 11.73% | 8.30% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GNT GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust | 7.65% | 6.85% | 7.37% | 7.00% | 7.03% | 6.73% | 9.39% | 10.07% | 12.12% | 8.94% | 12.59% | 14.66% |
Financials
GNT vs. BCSF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GAMCO Natural Resources, Gold & Income Trust and Bain Capital Specialty Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GNT and BCSF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GNT has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to BCSF (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNT dropped -68.55% vs BCSF's -62.42%.
GNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GNT and BCSF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer