GNOM vs. QQQ
GNOM (Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GNOM is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Solactive Genomics Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GNOM returned -9.59%/yr vs 17.86%/yr for QQQ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GNOM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
GNOM vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNOM achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return.
GNOM
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- 11.33%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 57.90%
- 3Y*
- 0.45%
- 5Y*
- -9.59%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 19.19%
- 1Y
- 40.74%
- 3Y*
- 28.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.86%
- 10Y*
- 21.84%
GNOM vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNOM Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF | 11.56% | 18.65% | -15.99% | -8.63% | -36.27% | -15.93% | 51.52% | 1.56% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 15.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between GNOM and QQQ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between GNOM and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GNOM vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GNOM
QQQ
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
GNOM
QQQ
Technology
GNOM
QQQ
Basic Materials
GNOM
-
QQQ
Communication Services
GNOM
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
GNOM
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
GNOM
-
QQQ
Energy
GNOM
-
QQQ
Financial Services
GNOM
-
QQQ
Industrials
GNOM
-
QQQ
Real Estate
GNOM
-
QQQ
Utilities
GNOM
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GNOM vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
GNOM
QQQ
GNOM vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GNOM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.44 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.42 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 13.14 | -3.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GNOM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.57 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.80 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.41 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
GNOM vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNOM drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNOM and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GNOM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.00% | -82.97% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.17% | -11.96% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.47% | -22.77% | -23.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.29% | -35.12% | -37.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.90% | -0.74% | -53.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -32.78% | -7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.30% | 3.11% | +3.19% |
Volatility
GNOM vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.51%. This indicates that GNOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GNOM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | 4.51% | +4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.72% | 12.10% | +7.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.66% | 15.94% | +10.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.61% | 22.37% | +11.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.19% | 22.29% | +11.90% |
GNOM vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GNOM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
GNOM vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
GNOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNOM Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GNOM and QQQ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GNOM has higher volatility (8.77%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNOM dropped -75.00% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.86% vs -9.59% for GNOM. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.86% return vs -9.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GNOM.
GNOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
GNOM is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. GNOM tracks Solactive Genomics Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GNOM and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GNOM and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer