PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNG.AX vs. ENEL.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GNG.AX vs. ENEL.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GNG.AX is traded in AUD, while ENEL.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENEL.MI values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNG.AX achieves a 23.82% return, which is significantly higher than ENEL.MI's 2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GNG.AX has outperformed ENEL.MI with an annualized return of 27.10%, while ENEL.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.95% annualized return.


GNG.AX

1D
-5.16%
1M
17.23%
YTD
23.82%
6M
28.74%
1Y
102.34%
3Y*
47.98%
5Y*
40.17%
10Y*
27.10%

ENEL.MI

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
2.96%
6M
4.24%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
15.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNG.AX vs. ENEL.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GNG.AX
GR Engineering Services Limited
23.82%91.49%22.04%18.42%5.73%85.28%61.96%-20.65%-19.84%9.39%
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
2.96%43.43%11.86%47.25%-23.37%-13.17%21.87%45.15%8.83%34.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GNG.AX and ENEL.MI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNG.AX vs. ENEL.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNG.AX
GNG.AX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GNG.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNG.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ENEL.MI
ENEL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNG.AX vs. ENEL.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNG.AXENEL.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

1.72

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.04

4.28

+4.76

GNG.AX vs. ENEL.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNG.AX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNG.AX and ENEL.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNG.AXENEL.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

0.98

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.50

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.69

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.33

+0.01

Drawdowns

GNG.AX vs. ENEL.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNG.AX drawdown since its inception was -80.75%, which is greater than ENEL.MI's maximum drawdown of -66.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNG.AX and ENEL.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNG.AXENEL.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.75%

-66.14%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.29%

-11.16%

-16.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-13.91%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.29%

-49.62%

+22.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.73%

-51.20%

-10.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.52%

-7.52%

-2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.41%

-18.34%

-12.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.08%

4.47%

+6.61%

Volatility

GNG.AX vs. ENEL.MI - Volatility Comparison

GR Engineering Services Limited (GNG.AX) has a higher volatility of 13.32% compared to Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) at 4.53%. This indicates that GNG.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENEL.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNG.AXENEL.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.32%

4.53%

+8.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.94%

16.78%

+18.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.17%

19.65%

+25.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.00%

21.61%

+14.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.01%

22.81%

+18.20%

Dividends

GNG.AX vs. ENEL.MI - Dividend Comparison

GNG.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than ENEL.MI's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
5.00%4.98%5.44%5.56%7.55%5.08%3.96%3.96%4.70%3.51%3.82%3.60%
GNG.AX
GR Engineering Services Limited
2.18%4.94%7.69%8.56%9.31%5.71%4.92%7.50%10.28%3.47%7.35%6.41%

Financials

GNG.AX vs. ENEL.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GR Engineering Services Limited and Enel SpA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. GNG.AX values in AUD, ENEL.MI values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


GNG.AX and ENEL.MI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNG.AX and ENEL.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer